[389-users] Re: Allow filters through PTA Plugin

Hi William Did you receive my doc on PAM PTA ? rgds ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[389-users] Re: cn or uid preferred in DNs?

Hello Good news if it's working I think that uid is mostly used. Rgds Le jeu. 29 nov. 2018 à 00:39, Alistair Cunningham a écrit : > Is it best practice to use "cn=,ou=..." or > "uid=,ou=..." in DNs? What are the advantages and > disadvantages of each? > > -- > Alistair Cunningham > +1 888 468

[389-users] cn or uid preferred in DNs?

Is it best practice to use "cn=,ou=..." or "uid=,ou=..." in DNs? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each? -- Alistair Cunningham +1 888 468 3111 +44 20 799 39 799 https://enswitch.com/ ___ 389-users mailing list --

[389-users] Re: Limiting access to same ou

Thank you, it's now working correctly! We don't need anonymous access. Is there a neat way to replace the ACL below that needs to be added once for each ou with one single ACL that works for every ou? Perhaps some way of saying that the "ou=2,dc=example,dc=com" in the target part must match

[389-users] Re: Limiting access to same ou

On 11/27/18 8:15 PM, Alistair Cunningham wrote: On 28/11/2018 12:08, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 11/27/18 7:24 PM, Alistair Cunningham wrote: I've added these acis, but a telephone (with objectClass 'person') in tenant1 can still see people (with objectClass 'inetOrgPerson') in tenant2.