[389-users] Re: Production level 389 release

2019-04-03 Thread William Brown
> On 4 Apr 2019, at 01:00, Jan Tomasek wrote: > > > It looks very nice, I will monitor this mailing list more closely. Thanks for > your work. Thank you! Everyone has done a lot to make this happen. If you have any other questions, feedback, or requests, please let us know. We’d love to

[389-users] Re: [389-announce] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.4.0.22

2019-04-03 Thread William Brown
> On 4 Apr 2019, at 09:00, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > Well RHEL/Centos are downstream, these particular releases are just upstream. > So 1.4.0 is for RHEL 8.0, and 1.4.1 is for RHEL 8.1, but for the layered > product RHDS (with new cockpit UI) that is going to be in 8.1. So its going > to

[389-users] Re: MIssing schemas?

2019-04-03 Thread William Brown
> On 3 Apr 2019, at 23:38, Crocker, Deborah wrote: > > I just loaded version 1.3.8.4 on a Centos7 system (yum install 389-ds, which > brings it all in) and there are no schemas deployed with the directory. There > is only 99user.ldif which has the skeleton entries. > > I've never seen this

[389-users] Re: [389-announce] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.4.0.22

2019-04-03 Thread Mark Reynolds
Well RHEL/Centos are downstream, these particular releases are just upstream.  So 1.4.0 is for RHEL 8.0, and 1.4.1 is for RHEL 8.1, but for the layered product RHDS (with new cockpit UI) that is going to be in 8.1.  So its going to be a while until you see these releases downstream... On

[389-users] Re: [389-announce] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.4.0.22

2019-04-03 Thread Vandenburgh, Steve Y
Are packages available for testing on RedHat/CentOS Linux? Steve Vandenburgh LDAP Directory Services/Identity Management From: Mark Reynolds Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 5:06 PM To: 389-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org; General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.

[389-users] Re: Production level 389 release

2019-04-03 Thread Jan Tomasek
Hi Mark, On 4/2/19 3:46 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: I'm preparing migration from 389 DS 1.2.5. I'm using single master and 4 replicas all on RedHat which I would like to abandon in favor Debian which is my main platform. ... And as I have mentioned multiple times on this mailing list the

[389-users] Re: MIssing schemas?

2019-04-03 Thread Mark Reynolds
Hi Deborah, Yes things changed since 1.2.x, the standard schema was moved to: /usr/share/dirsrv/schema/ Only custom schema gets added to the instance's schema directory. Regards, Mark On 4/3/19 9:38 AM, Crocker, Deborah wrote: I just loaded version 1.3.8.4 on a Centos7 system (yum install

[389-users] MIssing schemas?

2019-04-03 Thread Crocker, Deborah
I just loaded version 1.3.8.4 on a Centos7 system (yum install 389-ds, which brings it all in) and there are no schemas deployed with the directory. There is only 99user.ldif which has the skeleton entries. I've never seen this happen before. I don't see them as a separate package. I could

[389-users] Re: Production level 389 release

2019-04-03 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 2.4.2019 12.11, Jan Tomasek wrote: > Hi, > > I'm preparing migration from 389 DS 1.2.5. I'm using single master and 4 > replicas all on RedHat which I would like to abandon in favor Debian > which is my main platform. > > My idea was to use 389-ds 1.4.x line on Debian/Buster, but there is >