[389-users] Re: SSL configuration on dynamic deployments

2019-05-23 Thread William Brown
> On 23 May 2019, at 17:12, Angel Bosch Mora wrote: > >> I think to answer this, I'd like to see a diagram or description of >> the network and deployment topology you have in mind to help advise >> for what you want to achieve here :) >> > > Is really very simple. Think of it like the

[389-users] Re: acis in 99user.ldif and target on subtree

2019-05-23 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 5/23/19 12:38 PM, Angel Bosch Mora wrote: Hi! two more questions: 1- when migrating should I take care about ACIs in 99user.ldif? rightnow there are four entries: aci: (target="ldap:///cn=schema;)(targetattr !="aci")(version 3.0;acl "anonymous, no acis"; allow (read, search, compare)

[389-users] acis in 99user.ldif and target on subtree

2019-05-23 Thread Angel Bosch Mora
Hi! two more questions: 1- when migrating should I take care about ACIs in 99user.ldif? rightnow there are four entries: aci: (target="ldap:///cn=schema;)(targetattr !="aci")(version 3.0;acl "anonymous, no acis"; allow (read, search, compare) userdn = "ldap:///anyone;;) aci:

[389-users] Re: keeping internal attributes on export/import

2019-05-23 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 5/23/19 4:13 AM, Angel Bosch Mora wrote: hi! quick question: is there any reason to keep modifyTimestamp, modifiersName, createTimestamp, and creatorsName when reimporting on a migration? These are important attributes about each each entry.  Knowing when an entry was created or

[389-users] keeping internal attributes on export/import

2019-05-23 Thread Angel Bosch Mora
hi! quick question: is there any reason to keep modifyTimestamp, modifiersName, createTimestamp, and creatorsName when reimporting on a migration? abosch -- Institut Mallorqui d'Afers Socials. Aquest missatge, i si escau, qualsevol fitxer annex, es dirigeix exclusivament a la persona que

[389-users] Re: SSL configuration on dynamic deployments

2019-05-23 Thread Angel Bosch Mora
> I think to answer this, I'd like to see a diagram or description of > the network and deployment topology you have in mind to help advise > for what you want to achieve here :) > Is really very simple. Think of it like the typical MMR with 4 nodes: https://i.imgur.com/DY8aSAo.png but the