Glad to have helped. If you have more specific questions or details, we are happy to help at any time. Thanks!
> On 8 Oct 2020, at 17:29, Vincent Lemière <vinc...@lemiere.org> wrote: > > Hi, > Thanks for your reply, > I agree with you. > Duration and quality of links are more qualified. > The TTL value is more qualified to grant transaction. > I needed to know if some other solution could be envisaged. > Your answer confirms my view. > Thanks a lot > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : William Brown <wbr...@suse.de> > Envoyé : mercredi 7 octobre 2020 00:29 > À : vinc...@lemiere.org; 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Objet : Re: [389-users] Table of duration and acceptable distance between two > synchronized directories. > > Hi there, > > (removing 389-devel list from reply, this is probably better on the 389-users > list :) ) > > We don't have tables per-say. We don't have these because there are many > factors involved that you need to consider when designing this kind of > topology. > > For example, what rate of changes do you expect to be incoming? How much > latency and bandwidth exists between the replicas? How many replicas do you > want to deploy? How much latency are you willing to tolerate between the > nodes becoming consistent? > > We are aware of a number of deployments that have high rates of change > (thousands of writes per second) that are replicating between continents (ie > US/EU). However they also have high bandwidth/low latency links between these > locations to assist this. > > So I think there are more questions to answer here about your potential > deployment and your specific concerns you have. > > Thanks, > >> On 7 Oct 2020, at 07:24, 38...@lemiere.org wrote: >> >> Hello, >> do you have tables estimating the reasonable distance to synchronize two 389 >> directories between two sites. Are there tables of recommendations depending >> on the distance? >> What software tools or scripts allow evaluating it. >> >> Cordially, >> Vincent Lemiere >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To >> unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedorapr >> oject.org > > — > Sincerely, > > William Brown > > Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs, Australia > > — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs, Australia _______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
