NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you trust the sender and know the
content is safe.
__
Can you turn on replication logging? I think it's level 8192 in the
errorlog-level.
> On 4 Mar 2021, at 11:12, Colin Tulloch wr
12" name="replication-multimaster-extop"
[03/Mar/2021:14:06:07.917191372 -0600] conn=270076 op=1106 RESULT err=0 tag=120
nentries=0 etime=0.000662946
[03/Mar/2021:14:06:07.921837193 -0600] conn=270076 op=1107 MOD
dn="cn=CRLblahblah,c=US"
[03/Mar/2021:14:06:07.923754219 -060
, not
necessarily 389).
Colin Tulloch
Cloud Services Architect
Office - (972) 728-0391
Cell - (703) 244-5162
colin.tull...@entrust.commailto:colin.tull...@entrust.com
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Reynolds
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 2:31 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Limit on number of databases per directory server
instance
On 05/19/2015 02:25 PM, Colin Tulloch wrote:
Hi all –
Is there a limit to the number of databases
, etc that affect performance. Not sure how the number of separate
databases could matter.
[cid:image001.png@01D09246.B83AC650]
From: Mark Reynolds [mailto:marey...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 3:14 PM
To: Colin Tulloch; mreyno...@redhat.com; General discussion list for the 389
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 9:36 AM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Naming conflict on hub/consumer
On 01/21/2014 06:57 PM, Colin Tulloch wrote:
No, not showing up un-indexed anymore
Is this with the search
filter=((|(objectClass
Hi All -
We had a bundle of problems with our MM/consumer setup. Ran of out FDs on the
consumers, had the slapd process on a master die, etc.
We're getting things back up and running properly, but having some replication
issues now. We've got it mostly cleaned up - the masters are in sync,
: [389-users] Naming conflict on hub/consumer
On 01/21/2014 10:47 AM, Colin Tulloch wrote:
Hi All –
We had a bundle of problems with our MM/consumer setup. Ran of out FDs on the
consumers, had the slapd process on a master die, etc.
Platform? 389-ds-base version? rpm -q 389-ds-base
We’re
Hi All -
I've got another one today.
We have 1 attribute in our infrastructure that's extremely large - it's a PKI
CRL that's around 15MB. It sits in an entry that has about 6300 sub entries.
We had some previously mentioned issues running out of file descriptors on our
consumers.
After
, please open cases with RH support.
On 01/21/2014 12:19 PM, Colin Tulloch wrote:
Hi All –
I’ve got another one today.
We have 1 attribute in our infrastructure that’s extremely large – it’s a PKI
CRL that’s around 15MB. It sits in an entry that has about 6300 sub entries.
That shouldn't necessarily
...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 5:24 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Naming conflict on hub/consumer
On 01/21/2014 03:54 PM, Colin Tulloch wrote:
I bumped idlistscanlimit from 8000 to 15000
] Naming conflict on hub/consumer
On 01/21/2014 04:38 PM, Colin Tulloch wrote:
We are, and it returns 699/700 entries with the err=11. Not sure why that
number, but I have a ticket with redhat going on it. Focusing on the
replication conflicts for now, but the 700 is odd.
Are you still getting
you
view the properties. However in the directory tree view, you can see case
differences, and the full DN display on the bottom seems to show the actual
case.
Colin Tulloch
colin.tull...@entrust.commailto:colin.tull...@entrust.com
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
- so we're just trying to get a handle on the
implications of scaling the architecture up.
And how might all this apply different to 389, if at all ?
Colin Tulloch
colin.tull...@entrust.commailto:colin.tull...@entrust.com
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
14 matches
Mail list logo
