[389-users] Re: Unable to lock accounts with dsidm utility

2021-10-26 Thread Michael Starling
I found the issue. Please disregard. From: Michael Starling Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 3:29 PM To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: [389-users] Unable to lock accounts with dsidm utility Running the c

[389-users] Unable to lock accounts with dsidm utility

2021-10-26 Thread Michael Starling
Running the command below as root: dsidm slapd-mydomainDS -b dc=mydomain,dc=com account lock uid=mstarlingt,ou=People,dc=mydomain,dc=com Error: Insufficient access - Insufficient 'write' privilege to the 'nsAccountLock' attribute of entry 'uid=mstarlingt,ou=people,dc=mydomain,dc=com'. Versio

[389-users] Re: anonymous binds

2021-10-21 Thread Michael Starling
From: Mark Reynolds Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 9:36 AM To: Michael Starling ; General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: [389-users] anonymous binds On 10/21/21 9:26 AM, M

[389-users] Re: anonymous binds

2021-10-21 Thread Michael Starling
From: Mark Reynolds Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 3:47 PM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>; Michael Starling Subject: Re: [389-users] anonymous binds On 10/19/21 1:43 PM, M

[389-users] anonymous binds

2021-10-19 Thread Michael Starling
Good afternoon. I have a few questions about anon binds. In theory if you have 3000 user objects in the directory and anonymous binds have a limit returning 2000 entries can you still use anonymous binds in LDAP client configurations without issues? Or does something else take place when a use

[389-users] Re: Password lockout policy max failure.

2021-09-24 Thread Michael Starling
From: Mark Reynolds Sent: Friday, September 24, 2021 9:38 AM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>; Michael Starling Subject: Re: [389-users] Password lockout policy max failure. On 9/2

[389-users] Password lockout policy max failure.

2021-09-24 Thread Michael Starling
Hello. I'm having an issue where we have passwordMaxFailure set to "5" in the global policy but users are getting locked out after 3 attempts. Right now, when a user is locked out the only way I can tell is by looking at the attributes below. One is likely to assume that once the "accountUn

[389-users] Re: dsidm utility inconsistencies

2021-09-24 Thread Michael Starling
From: Mark Reynolds Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 12:16 PM To: Michael Starling ; General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: [389-users] dsidm utility inconsistencies On 9/23/21

[389-users] Re: dsidm utility inconsistencies

2021-09-23 Thread Michael Starling
From: Michael Starling Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 10:10 AM To: Mark Reynolds ; General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: [389-users] dsidm utility inconsist

[389-users] Re: dsidm utility inconsistencies

2021-09-23 Thread Michael Starling
From: Mark Reynolds Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 8:14 PM To: Michael Starling ; General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: [389-users] dsidm utility inconsistencies On 9/22/21 5

[389-users] Re: dsidm utility inconsistencies

2021-09-22 Thread Michael Starling
From: Mark Reynolds Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 3:38 PM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>; Michael Starling Subject: Re: [389-users] dsidm utility inconsistencies On 9/22/21 2

[389-users] dsidm utility inconsistencies

2021-09-22 Thread Michael Starling
Unless I'm interpreting the man pages, and documentation wrong there seems to be some issues with the dsidm utility. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong? This works. dsidm -W -D cn=manager -Z ldaps://labdsa101.mydomain.com -b dc=mydomain,dc=com account get-by-dn uid=mstarlingt,ou=People,dc=mydom

[389-users] Re: nsslapd-conntablesize & nsslapd-maxfiledescriptors

2021-09-07 Thread Michael Starling
e: > >> On 3 Sep 2021, at 23:37, Michael Starling wrote: >> >> Given the current settings on a directory server I'm still seeing the errors >> below in the logs at peak times. >> >> "ERR - setup_pr_read_pds - Not listening for new connections - too

[389-users] Re: update_pw_encoding messages

2021-09-03 Thread Michael Starling
From: Mark Reynolds Sent: Friday, September 3, 2021 9:49 AM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>; Michael Starling Subject: Re: [389-users] update_pw_encoding messages On 9/3/21 9

[389-users] update_pw_encoding messages

2021-09-03 Thread Michael Starling
I see these errors in my logs for some accounts on my consumers with chaining enabled. - WARN - update_pw_encoding - Could not read password attribute on 'uid=someuser,ou=people,dc=domain,dc=lott' Are these spurious messages or something that needs to be addressed? I came across this: https

[389-users] nsslapd-conntablesize & nsslapd-maxfiledescriptors

2021-09-03 Thread Michael Starling
Given the current settings on a directory server I'm still seeing the errors below in the logs at peak times. "ERR - setup_pr_read_pds - Not listening for new connections - too many fds open" nsslapd-reservedescriptors: 64 nsslapd-maxdescriptors: 65535 nsslapd-conntablesize: 8192 At the OS le

[389-users] Re: Database and OS tuning. (open files)

2021-09-01 Thread Michael Starling
From: William Brown Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 7:20 PM To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: [389-users] Re: Database and OS tuning. (open files) > On 2 Sep 2021, at 00:50, Michael Starli

[389-users] Re: Database and OS tuning. (open files)

2021-09-01 Thread Michael Starling
e_intvl = 75 net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_probes = 9 net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time = 300 On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 10:11 AM Michael Starling wrote: > > > Hello. > > I enabled chaining in our environment to replicate password policy attributes > from the consumers and hubs back to the masters and now we are

[389-users] Database and OS tuning. (open files)

2021-09-01 Thread Michael Starling
Hello. I enabled chaining in our environment to replicate password policy attributes from the consumers and hubs back to the masters and now we are seeing these errors in the logs We have to reboot for the system to become stable again. 31/Aug/2021:23:31:36.584135966 -0400] - ERR - configure

[389-users] Re: How to replicate password lockout attributes from a consumer or hub to a master(s)

2021-08-16 Thread Michael Starling
From: Michael Starling Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 10:54 AM To: Pierre Rogier ; General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: [389-users] Re: How to replicate password lockout attributes

[389-users] Re: How to replicate password lockout attributes from a consumer or hub to a master(s)

2021-08-16 Thread Michael Starling
From: Pierre Rogier Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 6:33 AM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Cc: Michael Starling Subject: Re: [389-users] Re: How to replicate password lockout attribute

[389-users] Re: How to replicate password lockout attributes from a consumer or hub to a master(s)

2021-08-16 Thread Michael Starling
From: Mark Reynolds Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 3:41 PM To: Michael Starling ; General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: [389-users] How to replicate password lockout attributes

[389-users] Re: How to replicate password lockout attributes from a consumer or hub to a master(s)

2021-08-13 Thread Michael Starling
From: Michael Starling Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 10:41 AM To: Mark Reynolds ; General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: [389-users] How to replicate password lockout attributes

[389-users] Re: How to replicate password lockout attributes from a consumer or hub to a master(s)

2021-08-13 Thread Michael Starling
From: Michael Starling Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 3:29 PM To: Mark Reynolds ; General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: [389-users] How to replicate password lockout attributes

[389-users] Re: How to replicate password lockout attributes from a consumer or hub to a master(s)

2021-08-12 Thread Michael Starling
From: Mark Reynolds Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 3:16 PM To: Michael Starling ; General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: [389-users] How to replicate password lockout attributes

[389-users] Re: How to replicate password lockout attributes from a consumer or hub to a master(s)

2021-08-12 Thread Michael Starling
From: Mark Reynolds Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 11:48 AM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>; Michael Starling Subject: Re: [389-users] How to replicate password lockout attributes

[389-users] How to replicate password lockout attributes from a consumer or hub to a master(s)

2021-08-12 Thread Michael Starling
Hello. I've taken over a large 389-ds environment running on Oracle Linux 8 and the first task I need to complete is to enable password lockouts. I was able to enable password lockouts successfully however it only works if the client is pointed directly to a master. The account locks out and