[389-users] Re: replicating specific attributes from AD to DS

I'm affraid that 388ds doesn't support this. We are using LSC here to do this. Em qui, 24 de mai de 2018 13:48, Paulo Cast escreveu: > hi guys, > > just wondering how to get specific attributes from AD > (cn=users,dc=domain,dc=com) replicated to DS

[389-users] Re: rest389

Oh, it's a shame, the REST interface would be very interesting and useful. Thanks, Danilo Em 26 de dez de 2017 5:49 PM, "Mark Reynolds" <mreyno...@redhat.com> escreveu: On 12/26/2017 12:34 PM, carne_de_passaro wrote: Hello guys, how can I install and test the rest389 on

[389-users] rest389

Hello guys, how can I install and test the rest389 on my 389ds servers? Is there any rpm package? Or how can I build, and with what version of 389ds is it compatible? Thanks. Danilo ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[389-users] Re: Multimaster replication + one way replication Q

We have 19 master servers and more than 150 slave servers replicating with each other and all replication agreements are full replication, but only one master server have the memberof plugin activated. We never have a problem with this. Em 4 de out de 2017 2:17 PM, "Mark Reynolds"

[389-users] Re: multimaster replication -preventing clients writes

Hi, I don't know if it will perform well but, you can create an ACI on the top of the tree and negate writes for all, except the master 2 IP. 2016-01-21 15:27 GMT-02:00 ghiureai : > Hi List, > I would like to know if there is a cfg option in a multimaster

Re: [389-users] Recreating replica agreements

Ok Mark, thank you! Danilo 2015-01-14 12:21 GMT-02:00 Mark Reynolds marey...@redhat.com: On 01/14/2015 08:01 AM, carne_de_passaro wrote: Hello guys, I am planning to recreate my replica agreements, which today uses SSL on port 636, to use startTLS on port 389. My question is: Do I

[389-users] Recreating replica agreements

Hello guys, I am planning to recreate my replica agreements, which today uses SSL on port 636, to use startTLS on port 389. My question is: Do I have to reinitialize the databases of the agreements that I recreate? I'm using the 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-34.el6_5.x86_64. Thanks in advance. Danilo

Re: [389-users] Initialization with fds 1.2.0 and 389-ds 1.2.10 failure

Both consumer. 2013/4/10 Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com On 04/10/2013 03:33 PM, carne_de_passaro wrote: I guess that is not exactly the same problem because I test with a 1.2.11.15 supplier or consumer? and a 1.3.0.2 supplier or consumer? (compiled) both in CentOS 6.3

[389-users] Initialization with fds 1.2.0 and 389-ds 1.2.10 failure

Hello folks, I have a test environment with a FDS version 1.2.0 on a Debian 5.0 x86 and a 389-ds 1.2.10.12-1.el6.x86_64 on a CentOS 6.3 x86_64. I have two suffix on the FDS, a root suffix and a subsuffix. I've configured two replication agreements, one for suffix. When I'm try to initialize the

[389-users] Console error

Hi, I build all components of the 389-ds 1.3.0.2 version The service is running alright, I've imported a ldif with my objects with ldif2db and it did just fine. My problem is with the console. I can enter on the first console, use my credentials and so. When I try to open both, admin server or