Hello,

the main reasons ...  all account below 500 are system account in
Redhat,CentOS.

In ubuntu and Debian all user account   below  >1000 are system account.

2011/11/25 Tom Tucker <tktuc...@gmail.com>

>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> If I comment out "auth   requisite   pam_succeed_if.so uid >= 500 quiet"
> in the system-auth file I was able to login with a UID of 108.  Assuming
> this restrictions is controlled on the Linux system, why do I experience no
> problems when authenticating against the Sun One DS? I agree, the proper
> fix would be to change users UID higher than 500.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Gary Algier <g...@ulticom.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/24/11 23:25, Tom Tucker wrote:
>> >
>> > My environment has a mixture of Solaris 8-10 and RHEL 4-5. These clients
>> > are currently authenticating against a Sun One 5.X DS.
>> > I have migrated the Sun One DB to my lab 389 DS. Users with a three
>> > digit uidNumber are unable to login to Linux systems, however if they
>> > connect to a Solaris system it works fine.  If I add a fourth digit to
>> > their uidNumber they are able access Linux systems just fine.  Did I
>> > miss a setting somewhere?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Tom
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > 389 users mailing list
>> > 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>
>> The problem is more likely to be a limitation imposed by the PAM
>> configuration on the Linux systems.  Go look at /etc/pam.d/* and look
>> for lines like:
>>     account     sufficient    pam_succeed_if.so uid < 500 quiet
>> A grep for 500 should find lots of examples.  The most likely conflict
>> is in /etc/pam.d/system-auth.  Comment the line and try again.
>>
>> Once upon a time UID numbers up through 99 were reserved for the OS, but
>> somewhere along the line we ran out of numbers for such things as
>> Apache, ssh, etc. which each needed their own number.  Someone then
>> decided that disallowing logins on these numbers was a good thing.
>> Unfortunately, a lot of places have extant UIDs < 500 (mine is 402).
>>
>> You have two choices:
>>     1. Change the UIDs of the logins of these users and all their
>>        files on all the systems they use.
>>     2. Leave them alone and "fix" every Linux system.
>>
>> The problem with the second choice is that you could have people with
>> the same UID as system processes.  When they do an "ls -l" they may see
>> that their files belong to "smolt" or "nagios" or similar.  Also, they
>> would be able to edit files that perhaps should be off limits to them.
>>
>> --
>> Gary Algier, WB2FWZ          gaa at ulticom.com         +1 856 787 2758
>> Ulticom Inc., 1020 Briggs Rd, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054  Fax:+1 856 866 2033
>>
>> Nielsen's First Law of Computer Manuals:
>>     People don't read documentation voluntarily.
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>



-- 

Thanks and Regards
Laxman Singh
Linux Administrator
webdunia.com [India] Pvt.Ltd (CMMI Level 3) | 582 MG Road Indore - 452003
MP [India] | Work +91-731-398-3486 Ext- 486 | Fax +91-731-2436615 | Mobile
+91-9826651100 *| *www.webdunia.net
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Reply via email to