server project.
*Subject:* Re: [389-users] MMR issue ...
There are a lot of RST for the time frame, especially on Server A.
I also see a lot TCP Retransmission for this particular replication
session. I also see a couple of TCP Dup ACKs. Is this enough to cause
the issue?
Of course, I don’t
urse, I don’t have an idea, what is the cause of that!
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 13, 2012 1:57 PM
> *To:* Reinhard Nappert
> *Cc:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
> *Subject:* Re: [389-users] M
for the 389 Directory server project.
*Subject:* Re: [389-users] MMR issue ...
On 11/13/2012 11:53 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
How would you proceed to figure out what is going on there?
Since it doesn't appear that the replication logs are giving enough
information, and you don'
ory server project.
*Subject:* Re: [389-users] MMR issue ...
On 11/13/2012 11:21 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
The 3 servers do not crash.
I am not sure about the network, though. My first assumption was that
the firewall (between A and B) might cause the issue. The latest
occurrence (the one, I desc
Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, November 13, 2012 1:15 PM
*To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
*Cc:* Reinhard Nappert
*Subject:* Re: [389-users] MMR issue ...
On 11/13/2012 11:02 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Rich,
Do you know what the cause of this
On 11/13/2012 11:15 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
You would expect that you saw this issue in different deployments,
but I only saw it in one instance.
If it turns out that the issue I see is identical the issue, you
mentioned, I’d like to know, when it was fixed.
Upon further investigation
: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Reinhard Nappert
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 12:22 PM
To: Rich Megginson; General discussion list for the 389 Directory server
project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] MMR issue ...
I use 1.2.8.2
Hi,
I've encountered issues with a MMR setup, which looks like the following:
A --- B
\ /
\ /
\ /
C
The replication works for approximately 24 hours. There are not many changes to
the content anyway. After about 1 day, the attri
t.org
[mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Grzegorz
Dwornicki
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 1:12 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] MMR issue
Hi
I must say this ldap replication connections look quite unusual. Ca
8/7 Reinhard Nappert
> Has somebody seen this problem as well?
>
> ** **
>
> -Reinhard
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:
> 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Reinhard Nappert
> *Sent:* Friday, A
Has somebody seen this problem as well?
-Reinhard
From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Reinhard Nappert
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [389-users] MMR issue
Hi,
I
Hi,
I have the following 389 DS version deployed: 389-Directory/1.2.8.2
B2011.130.190
I have a 3 box multi-master replication setup in a ring:
\ /\ / \ / \ / \
/
... C - A-B - C - A .
On 05/09/2011 02:06 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Hi,
I noticed an issue with 389 DS 1.2.7.5, which I have not seen before.
Here is what I do:
1. I create a two multi-master setup.
2. I don't perform any changes on the directory.
3. I delete the replica setup on both systems -- everything is fine
13 matches
Mail list logo