[389-users] Re: A plugin to record modification timestamp and modifiers DN for specific attribute

2020-09-21 Thread William Brown
> On 22 Sep 2020, at 00:48, Jan Tomasek wrote: > > Hi William, > >> An interesting idea that could bring you a lot assurance, would be to >> integrate and test with Address Sanitiser. This would help you find >> and detect potential memory safety issues in the plugin. If you want >> some advic

[389-users] Re: A plugin to record modification timestamp and modifiers DN for specific attribute

2020-09-21 Thread Jan Tomasek
Hi William, > An interesting idea that could bring you a lot assurance, would be to > integrate and test with Address Sanitiser. This would help you find > and detect potential memory safety issues in the plugin. If you want > some advice on how to do this, I'm happy to help. Using Address Saniti

[389-users] Re: A plugin to record modification timestamp and modifiers DN for specific attribute

2020-09-20 Thread William Brown
> On 19 Sep 2020, at 01:15, Jan Tomasek wrote: > > Hi William, > > On 9/9/20 2:31 AM, William Brown wrote: >>> I need to keep track when and by whom was entryStatus attribute >>> modified. For those informations, we have two attributes >>> entryStatusTimestamp and entryStatusModifier attribute

[389-users] Re: A plugin to record modification timestamp and modifiers DN for specific attribute

2020-09-18 Thread Jan Tomasek
Hi William, On 9/9/20 2:31 AM, William Brown wrote: >> I need to keep track when and by whom was entryStatus attribute >> modified. For those informations, we have two attributes >> entryStatusTimestamp and entryStatusModifier attributes. And every time >> entryStatus is changed, our plugin change

[389-users] Re: A plugin to record modification timestamp and modifiers DN for specific attribute

2020-09-08 Thread William Brown
> On 9 Sep 2020, at 01:21, Jan Tomasek wrote: > > Hello, > > I have one historical plug-in (from times of SunOne Directory), it was > in past ported for 1.2 version of 389 DS. But it fails to work with 1.4. > It is a bit more complicated than the one I was seeking help before, but > maybe it i