[389-users] Re: Database and OS tuning. (open files)

2021-09-03 Thread Paul Robert Marino
Starling wrote: > > > > > From: William Brown > Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 7:20 PM > To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Subject: [389-users] Re: Database and OS tuning. (open files) >

[389-users] Re: Database and OS tuning. (open files)

2021-09-01 Thread William Brown
> On 2 Sep 2021, at 00:50, Michael Starling wrote: > > Thank you, Paul. > > This is our current setting. Looks like we are at 5 minutes so we should be > ok. > > net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_intvl = 75 > net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_probes = 9 > net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time = 300 There are also a

[389-users] Re: Database and OS tuning. (open files)

2021-09-01 Thread Michael Starling
From: William Brown Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 7:20 PM To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: [389-users] Re: Database and OS tuning. (open files) > On 2 Sep 2021, at 00:50, Michael Starli

[389-users] Re: Database and OS tuning. (open files)

2021-09-01 Thread Michael Starling
From: Paul Robert Marino Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 10:30 AM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: [389-users] Re: Database and OS tuning. (open files) I would also tune t

[389-users] Re: Database and OS tuning. (open files)

2021-09-01 Thread Paul Robert Marino
I would also tune the TCP heartbeat in sysctl to make it shorter rather than the idle timeout. the default is 2 hours and not to cut it off if heartbeats are missed. I prefer to make it 2 minutes and kill on the second missed heartbeat for LDAP servers. the reason for this is that there are a lot