> provisions of the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. If you have received this
>> facsimile or electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by
>> telephone and return or destroy the original message to assure that it is
>> not read, copied, or dis
erver project.; Paul
Whitney; William Brown
Subject: Re: [389-users] Re: Problem with userRoot cache (last one)
On 1/16/19 12:05 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
On 1/16/19 12:02 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Hi Paul,
Okay I think I found the bug you are running into:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
project.;
Paul Whitney; William Brown
*Subject:* Re: [389-users] Re: Problem with userRoot cache (last one)
On 1/16/19 12:05 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
On 1/16/19 12:02 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Hi Paul,
Okay I think I found the bug you are running into:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
list for the 389 Directory server project.; Paul
Whitney; William Brown
Subject: Re: [389-users] Re: Problem with userRoot cache (last one)
On 1/16/19 12:05 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
On 1/16/19 12:02 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Hi Paul,
Okay I think I found the bug you are running into:
https://bug
ibuted by others.
*From:* William Brown
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:22:18 PM
*To:* 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
*Cc:* Paul Whitney
*Subject:* Re: [389-users] Problem with userRoot cache
> On 16 Jan 2019, at 06:49, Mark Reynolds wrote:
&g
ibuted by others.
*From:* William Brown
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:22:18 PM
*To:* 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
*Cc:* Paul Whitney
*Subject:* Re: [389-users] Problem with userRoot cache
> On 16 Jan 2019, at 06:49, Mark Reynolds wrot
ey
*Subject:* Re: [389-users] Problem with userRoot cache
> On 16 Jan 2019, at 06:49, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>
> What version were you previously on?
>
> Sounds like an issue with autocache sizing. The errors log might
give more info about why its being reset.
>
> Also check if
server project.; Paul
Whitney; William Brown
Subject: Re: [389-users] Re: Problem with userRoot cache
Hey Paul,
On 1/16/19 10:14 AM, Paul Whitney wrote:
We were on version: 389-ds-base-1.3.7.5-24.
What OS?
The nsslapd-cache-autosize was set to 0. We apply our own values.
To keep us afloat w
ibuted by others.
*From:* William Brown
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:22:18 PM
*To:* 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
*Cc:* Paul Whitney
*Subject:* Re: [389-users] Problem with userRoot cache
> On 16 Jan 2019, at 06:49, Mark Reynolds wrote:
&g
turn or
destroy the original message to assure that it is not read, copied, or
distributed by others.
From: William Brown
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:22:18 PM
To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: Paul Whitney
Subject: Re: [389-users] Problem wit
> On 16 Jan 2019, at 06:49, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>
> What version were you previously on?
>
> Sounds like an issue with autocache sizing. The errors log might give more
> info about why its being reset.
>
> Also check if "nsslapd-cache-autosize" is set under "cn=config,cn=ldbm
>
What version were you previously on?
Sounds like an issue with autocache sizing. The errors log might give
more info about why its being reset.
Also check if "nsslapd-cache-autosize" is set under "cn=config,cn=ldbm
database,cn=plugins,cn=config". If it is, set it to zero to stop the
12 matches
Mail list logo
