[389-users] Re: Recommended SLAPD cache sizes

2019-07-17 Thread William Brown
Generally the advice is: * autotune everything * handtune everything. IMO, autotuning is better (but I did write it, so I'm biased), and don't touch the "split" because we've seen lots of communication issues and challenges trying to educate about how the query processing works in the server

[389-users] Re: Recommended SLAPD cache sizes

2019-07-16 Thread Paul Whitney
Hi Mark, What I was referring to is: "nsslapd-cache-autosize-split The value sets the percentage of RAM that is used for the database cache. The remaining percentage is used for the entry cache. More than 512 MB RAM database cache do not improve the performance. Therefore, the database cache

[389-users] Re: Recommended SLAPD cache sizes

2019-07-16 Thread Mark Reynolds
Hi Paul, On 7/16/19 9:16 AM, Paul Whitney wrote: Is there some formula or recommendation on determining what would be the optimal cache settings for a directory server (389-ds of course) with following sizes? I looked at the DS 10 Admin Guide online and am getting conflicting information.