Re: [389-users] setup-ds-admin.pl failure

2013-01-30 Thread Jovan.VUKOTIC
To: cgrze...@opencsw.org; General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. Subject: Re: [389-users] setup-ds-admin.pl failure On 01/30/2013 01:21 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote: Am 29.01.13 schrieb Rich Megginson <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>: On 01/29/2013 09:39 AM, Carsten G

Re: [389-users] setup-ds-admin.pl failure

2013-01-30 Thread Carsten Grzemba
ce, the setup script did > > create > > > > /etc/opt/csw/dirsrv/slapd-instance-name > > > > directory even after the failure I described, > > > > as well as all the directories under > > > > /var/opt/csw/lib > > > > /va

Re: [389-users] setup-ds-admin.pl failure

2013-01-29 Thread Jovan.VUKOTIC
server project. Subject: Re: [389-users] setup-ds-admin.pl failure The problem is that the scripts use a env variable USER which is commonly not set in Solaris (there is LOGNAME common). It try to work arround this by setting this in: /etc/opt/csw/default/dirsrv So I guess if USER not set will the

Re: [389-users] setup-ds-admin.pl failure

2013-01-29 Thread Rich Megginson
-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Carsten Grzemba *Sent:* Tuesday, January 29, 2013 5:06 PM *To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. *Subject:* Re: [389-users] setup-ds-admin.pl failure Hi, I see you use my packages from www.opencsw.org. Which packag

Re: [389-users] setup-ds-admin.pl failure

2013-01-29 Thread Carsten Grzemba
rs-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > [mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] > On Behalf Of Carsten Grzemba > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 5:06 PM > > To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. > > Subject: Re: [389-users] setup-ds-admin

Re: [389-users] setup-ds-admin.pl failure

2013-01-29 Thread Carsten Grzemba
Hi, I see you use my packages from www.opencsw.org. Which package version you have installed? Please sent the output of: # pkgutil -c CSW389-ds-base ~Carsten Am 29.01.13 schrieb jovan.vuko...@sungard.com: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > It is not the first instance of 389DS I h