That is very encouraging, Narinder.
As mentioned I don't have subtables, so all is good there, and there may be
a few PICTs but none, I think, that are critical. Trialling should prove or
disprove that.
And I don't use 4D Write so that's another plus.
Your input truly appreciated. :)
Regards,
Pete
I suggest v15 because setting transparency when doing PICT conversion
is not available in v13
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 19:58:24 +, Peter BURGESS wrote:
> Thank you Chip.
> The suggestion, from other users and from my local 4D rep in
> Australia, is for a 2-step conversion from v11 to v13, then to
Thanks Tom, that is just the sort of news I was hoping for. Your input is
appreciated.
Regards,
Pete
-Original Message-
From: Tom Benedict
Sent: Friday, 11 October 2019 05:39 AM
>v17 is 64 bit only on windows (I believe).
On windows there are 32bit versions of v17 up through v17R4. v
Thank you Chip.
The suggestion, from other users and from my local 4D rep in Australia, is for
a 2-step conversion from v11 to v13, then to v17. So, similar to your advice.
I will go that direction, and keep a watch out for PICT files.
Regards,
Pete
-Original Message-
From: Chip Scheide
>v17 is 64 bit only on windows (I believe).
On windows there are 32bit versions of v17 up through v17R4. v17R5 is the first
64bit only.
>while v17 has a different architecture and is primarily object orientated, it
>will still accept and interpret v11 style language. Is this truly the case?
Y
I have done a conversion from v13 - v16, as an experiment. I had no
problems.
I did not run this for my users.
I did some, but not extensive testing.
as mentioned elsewhere there are a few things that I believe you can
not resolve without a 32 bit version of 4D (PICTs) from inside 4D, and
v17 i
my biggest problem here was trying to find the PICTs that were static
pictures, that as it turns out, 4D had placed for me. These came from a
gradient background that 4D used as part of the Form Wizard for listing
forms.
I let 4D create a bunch of these for me for tables which either had
speci
m>
Date: Tuesday, 8 October 2019 at 08:46
To: 4D Tech Mailing List <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
Cc: "Peter.Burgess"
Subject: Converting 4D Server v11 to v17
Hi all.
There was a small thread on this topic 12 months ago, overall the reaction
seemed to be positive, but given th
Hi all.
There was a small thread on this topic 12 months ago, overall the reaction
seemed to be positive, but given that time has passed and other people may
have tried a large 'jump' conversion such as this, I would be very
interested in their experiences.
In short we have a fairly large database,
9 matches
Mail list logo
