Working with an old project that's currently at v13. Text vars are
truncating to 32k. I initially thought this would be because of the Unicode
setting but even after enabling and restarting with Unicode they still
truncate.
What's the dang deal here?
Thanks
--
Kirk Brooks
San Francisco, CA
Are you using an old codec in BLOB TO TEXT or Convert Text with these variables
- anything with "Mac" in their name? Like "Mac text without length" or "Mac C
string"?
--
Jeffrey Kain
jeffrey.k...@gmail.com
> On Jan 5, 2017, at 5:08 PM, Kirk Brooks wrote:
>
> Working with an old project that'
Hi Jeff,
I first noticed it using the json component of NTK. But to test I tried
this:
C_TEXT($text)
$text:="x"*34000
$x:=Length($text)
$x is 32000. I tried some tricks like using BLOBs but none of that seems to
matter.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Jeffrey Kain wrote:
> Are you using an ol
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Kirk Brooks wrote:
> What's the dang deal here?
>
Well, I'm not really sure what the deal is but I resolved it by running
MSC, correcting a few other, unrelated problems, and then running 'repair'.
Verified with:
C_TEXT($text)
$text:="x"*5
$x:=Length($text)
I remember there was a bug where if you upgrade from v11 straight to v13
unicode mode was deactivated yet the compatibility dialog told otherwise.
> 2017/01/07 2:26、Kirk Brooks のメール：
> Well, I'm not really sure what the deal is but I resolved it by running
> MSC, correcting a few other, unrelate
Hi Miyako,
That may have been the issue. I wasn't part of the project at that time but
it's possible. It would be consistent with the behaviour I observed.
The good news is MSC/repair seems to fix it.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Keisuke Miyako
wrote:
> I remember there was a bug where if yo
On Jan 6, 2017, at 7:18 PM, Keisuke Miyako wrote:
> I remember there was a bug where if you upgrade from v11 straight to v13
> unicode mode was deactivated yet the compatibility dialog told otherwise.
Miyako, you are the king of 4D secrets and details. You are a human 4D
wikipedia!
OK, there ma
Will the initials DPA serve? I don't have insights into the 4D internals.
I've always approached 4D as a black box and only believe what I can
measure. That's served me very well down the years.
Below are some thoughts on CALL WORKER and CALL FORM. For what it's worth,
I consider these the most im
> Anything computationally expensive that's naturally suitable for
> parallelization. Not all problems are easy to parallelize. Dividing the
work
> and marshaling the results can end up being more trouble than it's worth.
Then
> again, when it's good...it's great.
Well, a few ideas...keeping in mi
On Jan 6, 2017, at 8:28 PM, David Adams wrote:
> Will the initials DPA serve? I don't have insights into the 4D internals.
> I've always approached 4D as a black box and only believe what I can
> measure. That's served me very well down the years.
Now that you mention it, I think DPA should defin
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Tim Nevels wrote:
> Didn’t mean to slight you. And you definitely do contribute more than JPR
on
> the iNUG now.
D'oh! I came across like a whiney prima donna. Sorry for that, not my
intention. Hey, JPR - let me join in in asking for some ideas from you.
You've
n 2017, at 03:28, 4d_tech-requ...@lists.4d.com wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: Why does a converted v13 db limit text vars to 32k?
> Message-ID: <30167d9f-3015-4b5e-9546-c42e35853...@mac.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> On Jan 6, 2017, at 7:18 PM, Keisuke Miya
On Jan 6, 2017, at 9:27 PM, David Adams wrote:
> Logging!
> If you write a custom log file, it's a total pain to have to manage writes
> from multiple processes. Don't. Everything calls into CALL PROCESS
Did you mean CALL WORKER here? You mention CALL PROCESS a few times in these
last few post
Jeff,
Thanks for the proofreading. Right, I was never meaning CALL PROCESS. Just
CALL WORKER and CALL FORM (which is more like CALL FORM INSTANCE WINDOW, or
something.)
You've worked with very large-scale 4D systems for as long as anyone, so
any comments and thoughts that you might have on these
On Jan 7, 2017, at 2:00 PM, JPR wrote:
>> I’m sure JPR has an email filter that flags messages that includes “JPR” so
>> he’s reading this.
> Gosh! Tim, you've caught red-handed!
You’re not the only one with email filters. I’ve also got one that looks for
“JPR” and “David Adams” in iNUG messa
[JPR]
Hi David, Tim, and others,
It seems that January is the time for flooding the street with flowers ;-)
Let's try to make a long story short: When I came back to 4D, I met (for the
1st time) Keisuke in Vegas. I was very happy to meet him, for he is an absolute
Wizard in programming, and I
Thanks for the post. You should get a T-Shirt printed for your tour in
black with white writing
It depends.
;-)
And, of course, it really does depend. Operations at scale are different
than operations on small collections. They're different problems. Yet
another reason it's helpful to have a
17 matches
Mail list logo
