Hi Rosea,

rosea grammostola wrote:
> Robin Gareus wrote:
>> rosea grammostola wrote:
>>   
>>> rosea grammostola wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Robin Gareus wrote:
>>>>       
>> [..snip..]
>>
>>   
>>>>>>>> BTW First test result of your kernel
>>>>>>>> kernel panic - not syncing VFS unable to mount root fs on 
>>>>>>>> unknown-block
>>>>>>>> (0,0)
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>> Thanks for trying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you have "do_initrd=yes" in /etc/kernel-img.conf ?
>>>>>>> If not, run `sudo update-initramfs -k 2.6.31-rt10-multimedia -c`
>>>>>>> followed by `sudo update-grub`
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you have an initrd (required to load both filesystem and disk 
>>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>>> modules during boot-time); please tell us what hardware your machine
>>>>>>> has:  `lspci -v` and what modules are loaded on the 
>>>>>>> 2.6.29-1-multimedia
>>>>>>> kernel `lsmod`.
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>> I don't have that kernel installed...
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>           
>>>>> Did you have an initrd for 2.6.31-rt10 when the kernel panic happened?
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>         
>>>>>> # lspci -v                             
>>>>>>           
>>>>>  [... snip...]
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Your hardware (including wifi) is supported by 2.6.31-rt10-multimedia.
>>>>>
>>>>> The error "unknown-block (0,0)" could mean that
>>>>>  a) the kernel module for your 82801 (ata_piix) is not loaded
>>>>>   -> missing initrd ; create it
>>>>>  b) hda1 is not your root device.
>>>>>   -> specfify root=/dev/XXX  on the kernel commandline or in
>>>>>   /boot/grub/menu.lst
>>>>>
>>>>> (b) is unlikely since you are able to boot other kernels, with the same
>>>>> grub defaults (unless you did some customization yourself of course)
>>>>>         
>>> for a)
>>>
>>> # Kernel image management overrides
>>> # See kernel-img.conf(5) for details
>>> do_symlinks = yes
>>> relative_links = yes
>>> do_bootloader = no
>>> do_bootfloppy = no
>>> do_initrd = yes
>>> link_in_boot = no
>>> postinst_hook = update-grub
>>> postrm_hook   = update-grub
>>>
>>>     
>> OK. That should create an initrd just fine. But is it created without
>> errors? There's still plenty of reasons why it may fail..
>>
>> Is /boot of your 64studio installation actually used by grub? (ie you
>> may have grub and /boot from an other Linux installation (dual boot) on
>> the same machine).
>>
>> Is there any Log message before the "unknown-block (0,0)" Panic message
>> that provide clues on why it fails?
>>
>> Is there a message about the disk(s) and partitions being detected?
>>
>> Did you specify a root=/dev/[hs]da[0-9] parameter in /boot/grub/menu.lst
>> Maybe older/other kernels use SCSI emulation hda vs. sda?
>>
>>   
>>> b) other kernels boots ok, custom changes
>>>     
>> It does not seem to be a general problem with the 2.6.31-rt10-multimedia
>>  more like some installation/setup edge-case.
> I use the kernel on Debian. I have Windows on my first partition, and 
> then a root (/) and home partition for Debian. I also use grub2.
> 
> No panic messages

In all your replies you never answered my repeated question if there
really is an /boot/initrd.img-2.6.31-rt10-multimedia on your disk and if
it's used by grub.

I assumed you have one, because you evaded a direct answer and posted
the kernel-img.conf config instead.

Meanwhile other testers have reported that they needed to generate the
initrd by hand. A bit of digging revealed that I [unintentionally]
disabled the initrd hook scripts bundled in with kernel-package..

Did you try to generate the initd  by calling
`sudo update-initramfs -k 2.6.31-rt10-multimedia -c` as mentioned above?


I'm currently preparing 2.6.31-rt11 for i386, i686 and amd64 and will
upload it to the 64studio repositories later tonight.
I'll send out a notice on this list when it's ready for testing.

so long,
robin
_______________________________________________
64studio-devel mailing list
64studio-devel@lists.64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel

Reply via email to