Re: [6lo] Understanding RFC8025 implementation and page switching

2017-03-01 Thread Samita Chakrabarti
Any volunteers from paging dispatch experts to add a few lines about the ordering examples and example usage with 6loRH on the 6lo wiki page? Thanks, -Samita On Mar 1, 2017 2:00 AM, "Robert Cragie" wrote: > I don't think the RFC is incorrect as it stands and it is arguable that > future "what if

Re: [6lo] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: (with COMMENT)

2017-03-01 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
Sounds good to me. > Am 28.02.2017 um 23:55 schrieb Kerry Lynn : > > Hi Mirja, > > Thanks for your review. Comments inline... > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind > wrote: > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: No Objecti

Re: [6lo] Understanding RFC8025 implementation and page switching

2017-03-01 Thread Robert Cragie
I don't think the RFC is incorrect as it stands and it is arguable that future "what if's" shouldn't really be captured in an RFC and it should represent only the state of the art. Therefore, I think the Wiki would be the right place to do this. Robert On 1 March 2017 at 09:03, Pascal Thubert (pt

Re: [6lo] Understanding RFC8025 implementation and page switching

2017-03-01 Thread Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Unsure which format would be best, Samita. There can be a variety of such questions. So maybe a Q&A in the WiKi could collect this sort of questions when they occur? At least this thread is now visible. Take care, Pascal From: Samita Chakrabarti [mailto:samitac.i...@gmail.com] Sent: mercredi 1