cost
sensors in server racks,
yet I have seen no suggested wired MAC for this application. RFC 8163
covers this base.
If hosts are connected via Ethernet or PLC, why would this scheme be
required?
Perhaps if these areas are addressed?
Respectfully, Kerry Lynn
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 8:50 AM Carles G
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:15 PM Haoyu Song wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the clarification! It seems you suggest that the bandwidth
> efficiency (i.e., the header overhead) is much more important than the cost
> of storage and processing in wireless. It would be great if we could find
could be
marginally clarified by adding " (e.g. by IPv6 Neighbor Discovery
[RFC4861]."
Kerry
> Dale
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 6:05 PM Kerry Lynn wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 5:29 PM Erik Kline wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I've been trying to catch up on
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 5:29 PM Erik Kline wrote:
> All,
>
> I've been trying to catch up on and close all outside INT area errata. In
> so doing, I've come across:
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4814
>
> filed against RFC 6282.
>
> My inclination is to reject this erratum, since 25
Hi Remy,
I have an alternative suggestion for comment 3; see below...
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 6:30 AM Liubing (Remy)
wrote:
> Hello Carles,
>
> I'm really sorry for this late reply.
>
> It seems that we have reached consensus on 4 of the 5 comments. Please
> find my new response to your 3rd com
-- Forwarded message -
From: Kerry Lynn
Date: Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: [6lo] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases
To: Shwetha
Dears Chairs and authors,
Here are some comments on the draft. In general the document is
well-structured
and readable and I hope it
+1E100
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Thomas Watteyne
wrote:
> Thanks James for all you've done!
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:00 PM, wrote:
>
>> Hello 6lo-WG:
>>
>>
>>
>> Gabe and I regret to let you know that James Woodyatt will no longer be
>> our secretary for the working group as he has
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for your review. Comments inline...
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Stephen Farrell
wrote:
> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> em
Hi Mirja,
Thanks for your review. Comments inline...
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind
wrote:
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> em
Hi Joel,
Thanks for your review. Comments inline...
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> Joel Jaeggli has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addres
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your review. Comments inline...
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addres
Hi Alia,
Thanks for your review. Comments inline...
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Alia Atlas wrote:
> Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses
Hi Alissa,
Thanks for your review. Sorry it has taken to long to get back to you.
Comments inline...
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the su
Dale,
Thanks for your thorough review of draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac. Sorry that it
has taken
so long to get back to you. Can you take a look at the new version and see
if
it addresses your concerns? Comments inline...
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> Comments on draft-ietf
Hi Tim,
Thanks very much for the review; sorry for the delayed response.
Comments inline...
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for this draft. These comments
> were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directo
ul 6, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Dave Thaler wrote:
> Ok, I just posted an update in which I tried to take Kerry's feedback into
> account.
>
> Some notes below about what I did, but see the diffs for details.
>
> > From: Dave Thaler
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 201
+1
Kerry
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Prof. Diego Dujovne <
diego.dujo...@mail.udp.cl> wrote:
> +1
>
> Diego
>
> 2016-04-10 6:56 GMT-03:00 peter van der Stok :
>
>> +1
>> Peter
>>
>> Alexander Pelov schreef op 2016-04-08 18:53:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> +1 on adopting the draft.
>>>
>>> Best,
17 matches
Mail list logo
