As one of the original supporters, I have no concerns with this.
Robert
On 3 April 2017 at 02:16, Gabriel Montenegro <
gabriel.montene...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
>
>
> Making sure the list is aware of this: at the meeting in Chicago last
> Wednesday we indicated that we intend to drop t
RFC page?
> This is not an Errata but the order and explanation would be quite useful
> for the implementers for future extensions.
>
>
>
> Alternatively, updating the 6lo wiki to contain these information would
> be useful. Any suggestions ?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Samita
&g
On 27 February 2017 at 13:56, Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
wrote:
> Dear Samita :
>
>
>
> *From:* Samita Chakrabarti [mailto:samitac.i...@gmail.com]
>
>
>
> Hello :
>
>
>
> I am trying to decipher the RFC 8025 packet header sequence and bit
> patterns from reading the document and http://www.iana.o