Yes, I see. Thanks for the explanation!
Tengfei
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthub...@cisco.com> wrote:
> I see TengFei:
>
>
>
> The text means a header that is used for the purpose of routing, not
> necessarily a source route header like an IPv6 RH…
>
>
>
> Take c
I see TengFei:
The text means a header that is used for the purpose of routing, not
necessarily a source route header like an IPv6 RH…
Take care,
Pascal
From: Tengfei Chang [mailto:tengfei.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: mercredi 6 janvier 2016 16:43
To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Cc: 6tisch@ietf.org;
Hi Pascal,
Thanks for the replies! And thanks a lot for the slides! That's exactly the
thing what we are looking for!
The IPv6ExT is IPv6 Extension Header with the value of 7 of EID which
indicate the following IPv6 Header(IPHC).
I misunderstood IPinIP-6LoRH since I saw the first sentence of sec
Hello TengFei : )
I hope you’re doing good!
Please see below:
1. in section 4.2, second paragraph:
One or more 6LoRHs MAY be placed in a 6LoWPAN packet and MUST always
be placed before the LOWPAN_IPHC [RFC6282].
What's the situation when Ip-in-Ip encapsulation structure was used?
The idea is t
Dear Pascal,
Recently Jonathan and I are working on the implementation of new 6loRH
draft: draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-00. There are something in the draft
we are not that clear yet and we would like to ask. Following are the
question:
1. in section 4.2, second paragraph:
*One or more 6LoRHs
