Thanks all for the comments! Then we will use the recommended format (second one) on the plugtest!
Tengfei On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Qin Wang <qinwang6...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I think both of the two format are fine. But, if IEEE802.15 recommends the > second one, I think we should choose the second. > > Thanks > Qin > > > On Monday, January 11, 2016 11:17 AM, "pat.kin...@kinneyconsultingllc.com" > <pat.kin...@kinneyconsultingllc.com> wrote: > > > Thank you for the figures, I agree on both, especially the second one. > The advantages of the recommended approach are: one octet shorter for case > of single subtype ID and 256 available subtype ID addresses for any length. > > Sincerely, Pat > > On 11, Jan2016, at 9:19, Tengfei Chang <tengfei.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Pat, all, > > I would like to make sure whether this format will be the right format for > the plugtest and everyone will agree. The attached is the document > 15-15-0939-02. > > There are two options for the format we will use in the plugtest: > > 1. we use what defined in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-6tisch-6top-sublayer-04, which use > the format defined in > IEEE802.15.4e-2012, section 5.2.4.3 (page 81). If we decide to use this > one, we need short/ long type of the subIE. > > > *Bits: 0-10* > *11-14* > *15* > *Octets: 2* > *32-35* > *36-39* > *40-47* > *Octets* > *Bits: 0-10* > *11-14* > *15* > Payload IE Content Length > Group ID > Type (0b1) > Length > Sub-type ID > Type > Ver > Code > SFID > other field > Length > (0x00) > Group ID (0xf) > Type (0b1) > Payload IE > Payload IE Content > Payload Termination IE > > > 2. we use what define in document 15-15-0939-02, which use the format > defined in last page of the document: > For example the 6P command defined in sublayer draft: > > the payload will be: > > *Bits: 0-10* > *11-14* > *15* > *16-23* > *24-27* > *28-31* > *32-39* > *octets* > *Bits: 0-10* > *11-14* > *15* > Payload IE Content Length > Group ID > Type (0b1) > Sub-type ID > Ver > Code > SFID > other field > Length > (0x00) > Group ID (0xf) > Type (0b1) > Payload IE > Payload IE Content > Payload Termination IE > > Do we agree on the second one? > > Tengfei > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Tengfei Chang <tengfei.ch...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I see. Thanks a lot Pat for the information! I found the document you > mentioned. I will update the format in the Golden Images. > > Have a good day! > Tengfei > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:25 PM, pat.kin...@kinneyconsultingllc.com < > pat.kin...@kinneyconsultingllc.com> wrote: > > Tengfei; > > The IEEE 802.15 IG 6T recommended a format for sub-IEs in document > 15-15-0939-02 sent to this reflector on 30 November 2015. The following is > an excerpt from that document: > "Accordingly, the IEEE 802.15 IG 6T recommends that the IETF use an > alternate scheme that restricts each Payload IE to only one sub-type ID and > content, i.e. no nesting. The advantages of this recommended scheme is > that it eliminates one octet from the total Payload IE, it allows a full > 256 sub-type IDs, and each sub-type length can be up to 2046 octets.” > Therefore, if 6tisch adopts the above recommendation, there would be no > long or short types. > > Pat > > Pat Kinney > *Kinney Consulting LLC* > IEEE 802.15 WG vice chair, SC chair > ISA100 co-chair, ISA100.20 chair > O: +1.847.960.3715 > pat.kin...@kinneyconsultingllc.com > > On 8, Jan2016, at 10:14, Tengfei Chang <tengfei.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello all, > > As I mentioned on the Call, the 6top sublayer draft seems didn't define > the type of subIE used by 6P command ,long or short type? Let me know if I > missed it from the draft! Thanks you! > > Regard, > Tengfei > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > > > > > > > > > <15-15-0939-02-0000-IETF_6tisch_IE_Information.docx> > > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > >
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list 6tisch@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
