[6tisch] 6tisch security bi-weekly meetings

2016-11-17 Thread Michael Richardson
The 6tisch security design team will meet every two weeks starting on November 29th at 14:00 UTC. The meeting is anchored to UTC, not EST, but that will matter only in March. The nov. 29th meeting will be devoted to: a) recap of IETF97; work ensuing from the meeting. b)

Re: [6tisch] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-16

2016-11-17 Thread Tero Kivinen
Dale R. Worley writes: > I'm new here, but I notice that draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal mostly uses > "802.15.4" (39 instances) rather than "802.15.4e" (4 instances), even > though it applies only to TiSCH networks. Is this intended? What is > the best style? The 802.15.4e is and addition to the

Re: [6tisch] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-16

2016-11-17 Thread Dale R. Worley
I'm new here, but I notice that draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal mostly uses "802.15.4" (39 instances) rather than "802.15.4e" (4 instances), even though it applies only to TiSCH networks. Is this intended? What is the best style? Dale ___ 6tisch mailing

Re: [6tisch] macLinkType for the minimal configuration (draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-16)

2016-11-17 Thread Yasuyuki Tanaka
Thank you for your comment, Pat! I noticed your message wasn't on the ML; I paste it here. On 2016/11/17 16:40, pat.kin...@kinneyconsultingllc.com wrote: Yasuyuki brings up a very good point. A major effort in creating 802.15.4-2015 was to eliminate (at least try to) ambiguities. As per the

[6tisch] Fwd: IoT Directorate

2016-11-17 Thread Thomas Watteyne
FYI -- Forwarded message - From: Terry Manderson Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 at 09:00 Subject: IoT Directorate To: i...@ietf.org Dear IETF, The interest in IoT technologies in the IETF, and more broadly in industry and other SDOs, is

Re: [6tisch] 6TiSCH WG meeting @IETF97: remote participation

2016-11-17 Thread Qin Wang
Hi Thomas, >From the SF0 presentation slides, I can see the Timeout mechanism is still in >discussion. It is not clear who will be responsible for setting Timeout, SF0 >or 6P. And this modification you mentioned is related. Right? Maybe I missed >something. ThanksQin On Wednesday,

[6tisch] macLinkType for the minimal configuration (draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-16)

2016-11-17 Thread Yasuyuki Tanaka
Hi all, I'm wondering if the cell scheduled for the minimal configuration should be ADVERTISING in terms of macLinkType rather than NORMAL. The definition of LinkType can be found in Table 8-46 of IEEE 802.15.4-2015. This is a table about MLME-SET-LINK.request parameters. It says: Set to