Re: [6tisch] Review of draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-03

2019-04-17 Thread Tengfei Chang
After talking with Yatch, I realize I misunderstand the first comments: (Yatch, please correct me if I said something wrong.) For the join request/response, they are only sent on autonomous cell at the first hop, after that, they are OK to sent on managed cell since the node will only recognize

Re: [6tisch] Review of draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-03

2019-04-17 Thread Tengfei Chang
Hi Yatch, Thanks for the reviewing! I will reply your comments inline. On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 2:03 PM Yasuyuki Tanaka wrote: > Thank you, the authors! > > I confirmed most of my comments to the previous version have been > addressed. It reads better :-) > > Here are my comments: two comments

Re: [6tisch] [Call for Review] draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-03

2019-04-17 Thread Tengfei Chang
Hi Atis, Thank you for reviewing and giving the comments! I will reply them below. For your comments: *- There is still one reference left to the number 16 as the max number of channels (which 2.4 GHz frequency-band-specific). It's in the formula `channelOffset(MAC) = hash(EUI64, 16)`. This may

Re: [6tisch] [Call for Review] draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-03

2019-04-17 Thread Tengfei Chang
( I accidentally sending the email before finishing) the reply continues inline... On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 1:57 PM Tengfei Chang wrote: > Hi Fabrice, > > Thanks a lot for your detailed comments! I will reply them inline below. > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:39 AM Fabrice Theoleyre > wrote: > >>

Re: [6tisch] [Call for Review] draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-03

2019-04-17 Thread Tengfei Chang
Hi Fabrice, Thanks a lot for your detailed comments! I will reply them inline below. On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:39 AM Fabrice Theoleyre wrote: > Dear Tengfei, > > Please find below my review of the draft. I isolated the corresponding > blocks, and inserted my comments after 'FT>' > > The draft