Very good Tengfei
This addresses my comments.
Note that the uppercase NOT is not a valid BCP14 term by itself. I’d reword to
say that the distribution of traffic over multiple parents is a routing
decision that is out of scope for MSF...
Regards,
Pascal
Le 6 déc. 2019 à 12:01, Tengfei Chang
Thank you, Tengfei.
> On Dec 6, 2019, at 22:49, Tengfei Chang wrote:
>
> Handling DSCP value will be a per-packet process. Can we pass DCSP value
> to the TSCH layer using the interface for transmission defined by
> IEEE802.15.4? I don't think so.
>
> TC: Not sure this is a standard way to d
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 9:31 PM Yasuyuki Tanaka
wrote:
> Hi Pascal, Tengfei,
>
> On 12/6/2019 6:48 PM, Tengfei Chang wrote:
> > Yes, MSF indeed aware of the routing information such as RPL parent, I
> > consider this is like an information stored at IPv6 layer that MSF can
> > read it from without
Hi Yatch,
The session is distinguished by the parent, there is no such case that two
MSF sessions have a 'common parent'.
MSF session to parent is 1 to 1 mapping relationship.
MSF session should be ends as long as a neighbor is un-selected as parent.
In the text, I agree we only details how MSF d
Hi Tengfei,
How do we distinguish multiple MSF sessions?
What if two MSF sessions have a same "selected parent", and then one of
them selects another selected parent? How many negotiated cells should
be taken over to the new selected parent?
These are not covered by the current text, and I th
Hi Pascal, Tengfei,
On 12/6/2019 6:48 PM, Tengfei Chang wrote:
Yes, MSF indeed aware of the routing information such as RPL parent, I
consider this is like an information stored at IPv6 layer that MSF can
read it from without touching the frame L2 payload.
In such sense, I could consider the DS
I will add the following text at the intro part of MSF draft:
*MSF works closely with RPL, specifically the routing
parent defined in .
This specification only describes how MSF works with one routing parent,
which is phrased as "selected parent".The activity o
Yes I do
Regards,
Pascal
Le 6 déc. 2019 à 09:49, Tengfei Chang a écrit :
Pascal,
Yes, MSF indeed aware of the routing information such as RPL parent, I consider
this is like an information stored at IPv6 layer that MSF can read it from
without touching the frame L2 payload.
In such sense
Pascal,
Yes, MSF indeed aware of the routing information such as RPL parent, I
consider this is like an information stored at IPv6 layer that MSF can read
it from without touching the frame L2 payload.
In such sense, I could consider the DSCP value can be another information
stored at upper layer
