Re: [6tisch] draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-sfx-01 comments

for the actual thesis contribution, I don't expect to have any results to share before April. Best regards, Lotte > Thank you. > Regards, > > Diego Dujovne > > 2018-03-07 13:48 GMT-03:00 Lotte Steenbrink <mailto:lotte.steenbr...@fu-berlin.de

Re: [6tisch] draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09 comments

ion > -- > Section 3.3.3. says that NumCells MUST be >= 1. What happens if (for example) > the Relocation CellList contains 5 cells, but NumCells == 1? > Shouldn't it be that NumCells MUST be == length(Relocation CellList)? > > XV: the draft states: The

[6tisch] draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-sfx-01 comments

Dear members of the 6TiSCH working group, as with my draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09 comments , during the past weeks, I've attempted to implement SFX as part of my master's thesis. During this process, I've come acros

[6tisch] draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09 comments

Dear 6TiSCH Working Group, somehow I missed the WGLC announcement for the 6top protocol draft. I'm not quite sure if I'm too late with my review/questions now, but in case I'm not, I'd like to share what I've got so far. As for the context of my E-Mail: I'm currently implementing the 6top Proto

[6tisch] SF0 and 6top error/return code questions

Dear 6TiSCH Working Group, while reading through the SF0 and 6top drafts, I've struggled with the way some error and return codes are defined and used. Since I'm new to 6TiSCH, I'm not quite sure if there's something that I'm missing or of this is unintentional, and would be very grateful for