nCell.
Best regards,
Toshio Ito
From: Tengfei Chang
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 10:32 PM
To: ito toshio(伊藤 俊夫 ○ＲＤＣ□ＣＮＬ)
Cc: 6tisch@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6tisch] [Call for Review] draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-03
Hi Toshio,
Thanks for review the draft!
For your comments:
Minimum number of managed
t, and CellOption in 6P ADD request is always (?) Tx=1
>
> RX=0, there is no downstream managed cells. As a result, downstream
>
> packets such as DAO-ACK have to use AutoDownCell or the minimal
>
> cell. I think we should have downstream cells, too.
>
>
>
>
>
> B
Tuesday, April 09, 2019 1:06 PM
To: 6tisch@ietf.org
Subject: [6tisch] [Call for Review] draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-03
Dear all,
A new version of "draft-ietf-6tisch-msf" is just published at here:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-03.txt
This version mainly resolved the issues prese
Hi Atis,
Thank you for reviewing and giving the comments! I will reply them below.
For your comments:
*- There is still one reference left to the number 16 as the max number of
channels (which 2.4 GHz frequency-band-specific). It's in the formula
`channelOffset(MAC) = hash(EUI64, 16)`. This may c
( I accidentally sending the email before finishing) the reply continues
inline...
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 1:57 PM Tengfei Chang
wrote:
> Hi Fabrice,
>
> Thanks a lot for your detailed comments! I will reply them inline below.
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:39 AM Fabrice Theoleyre
> wrote:
>
>>
Hi Fabrice,
Thanks a lot for your detailed comments! I will reply them inline below.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:39 AM Fabrice Theoleyre
wrote:
> Dear Tengfei,
>
> Please find below my review of the draft. I isolated the corresponding
> blocks, and inserted my comments after 'FT>'
>
> The draft i
Hello Tengfei and the 6tisch community,
I'm happy to see the frame pending bit removed and other big improvements
in clarity and functionality.
Following up on my other previous comments,
- There is still one reference left to the number 16 as the max number of
channels (which 2.4 GHz frequency-b
Dear Tengfei,
Please find below my review of the draft. I isolated the corresponding blocks,
and inserted my comments after 'FT>'
The draft is very well written, and I have mostly minor comments.
Great job!
Best regards,
Fabrice
an implementor MAY implements MSF
FT> an implementor MA
Dear all,
A new version of "draft-ietf-6tisch-msf" is just published at here:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-03.txt
This version mainly resolved the issues presented during IETF 104 meeting.
I would like to mention one of the main changes in this version is we
removed the frame pen
