Hi Xavi,
Thanks for the summary. Please see inline.
>
>
>I tried to summarize the action items we identified during the call. Please
>comment if you do not agree. Here a list:
>
>
>1 clarify the use of RC_END_OF_LIST text upon receiving a list command and
>reaching the end of the list
[Qin]: ag
Hi,
I tried to summarize the action items we identified during the call. Please
comment if you do not agree. Here a list:
1 clarify the use of RC_END_OF_LIST text upon receiving a list command and
reaching the end of the list
2 Clarify that if a node has too many cells to add that do not fit in
Hi Simon,
I agree to your detailed analysis about with/without adding Confirmation. I
would like add the possible processes after the transactions.
After 2-way transaction, node A will find the inconsistency by generation
counter when it starts a new transaction. And then, node A can send CLEAR
Dear all,
From the part of the meeting I could attend,
I could not detect an agreement on the timeout calculation,
as 6P requires. Can we discuss this on the ML?
Regards,
Diego
2016-12-16 17:05 GMT-03:00 Simon Duquennoy :
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks fo
Hi all,
Thanks for an fruitful discussion today!
I wanted to follow up on Nicola's thoughts about adding a final 6P
Confirmation to all transactions.
There is a fundamental difference in having a 2-way vs 3-way transaction:
* 2-way: at the end, the initiator A either (1) commits but does not
know
Hi Yatch and all,
I think 6top as a sublayer should support broadcast/multicast, but it may not
necessary for 6P to support scheduling cells for broadcast/multicast
dynamically. There may be two solutions for broadcast/multicast. One is use EB
cell in slotframe 0, because it is not supposed that
@Thomas, Thanks a lot for the meeting!
@Yatch, I like your comments. Looking forwarding to discuss on it. Here are
two more comments(tiny) from my side :
[slide-17]
ppt>*Section 4.3*: do we wait for a link-layer ACK on the Response (or
Confirmation) before committing the transaction?
ppt> à repo
Thank you, Thomas.
Let me add comments on a couple of the ppt slides in advance, which
could save time of the coming meeting, I hope...:
The ppt sides Thomas provided:
https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/meetings/raw/c9bd4d78fa452a0588abefc104d08520d32e0c26/161209_webex/slides_161209_webex.ppt
--
All,
Per our discussion at the last interim (
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tisch/current/msg05069.html) we will
have a discussion specific to 6P this Friday, at the same time as the
interim.
We will use the same Webex setup as the iterim
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tisch/curr