Re: [6tisch] Clarification on MSF-06

2019-10-13 Thread Christian Hopfner
<6tisch@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [6tisch] Clarification on MSF-06 Thanks Abdussalam for the comments, I updated the text as following: The node SHOULD send some form of keep-alive messages to all its neighbors it has negotiated cell with. The node sends a keep- alive message to the ne

Re: [6tisch] Clarification on MSF-06

2019-10-11 Thread Tengfei Chang
Thanks Abdussalam for the comments, I updated the text as following: The node SHOULD send some form of keep-alive messages to all its neighbors it has negotiated cell with. The node sends a keep- alive message to the neighbor if no frames is received from that neighbor within a

Re: [6tisch] Clarification on MSF-06

2019-10-11 Thread Abdussalam Baryun
Hi Tengfei, I am interested like Christian to see the poll mechanism into this draft. I don't think it is right to refer to RFC7554 (problem statement) which is an informational RFC, while this draft is a proposed standard, I think it is better to state the mechanism into the use case of minimum

Re: [6tisch] Clarification on MSF-06

2019-10-11 Thread Tengfei Chang
Hi Christian, Thanks for pointing this issue out! The neighbor polling section is removed at 03 version. Can't remember why we removed it. I re-edited this sections to fit the current content of MSF draft. I paste it below. It will the be last step of boot behavior after it starts sending EB and