Re: [6tisch] Feedback on the 6TiSCH MSF

2018-09-11 Thread Thomas Watteyne
Atis, While I need to answer quickly (i.e. no real answer at this point), I want stress that the feedback you're giving is hugely important and appreciated. Yes, as in all standards, getting input from implementors on how to tune parameters in the logical step as the standards themselves are being

Re: [6tisch] Feedback on the 6TiSCH MSF

2018-09-11 Thread Yasuyuki Tanaka
Hello Atis, > So, I suggest adding a requirement/recommendation for the implementer to > prioritize 6top packets over data packets. I agree with you. I prefer recommendation here. Best, Yatch ___ 6tisch mailing list 6tisch@ietf.org

[6tisch] Feedback on the 6TiSCH MSF

2018-09-11 Thread Atis Elsts
Dear all, First, let me thank you for the hard work of standardizing 6TiSCH scheduling! I tried partially implementing and evaluating the 6TiSCH MSF (https://tools..ietf.org/html/draft-chang-6tisch-msf-02) in Contiki-NG, on top of its existing 6top implementation. Some comments and questions