Hi Tengfei,
Thanks for these questions.
1. We're not protecting against selective jamming on the minimal cell
indeed. This is a tricky problem, because beacons must include enough
information for nodes to find out when to tx/rx for the join procedure, and
a not-joined-yet node can do it then so
Hello Tengfei,
Thank you for your review!
As to your comment on Equation 1, we used 'c' to highlight it as the
unknown variable when solving the equation, but indeed it refers to the
channel offset. We will make this explicit in the text.
Best,
/Marco
On 4/4/19 8:57 PM, Simon Duquennoy wrote:
Hi Tengfei,
Thanks for these questions.
1. We're not protecting against selective jamming on the minimal cell
indeed. This is a tricky problem, because beacons must include enough
information for nodes to find out when to tx/rx for the join procedure, and
a not-joined-yet node can do it then so
Hello Authors,
I just reviewed the draft. It reads pretty good for me! I only found a tiny
typo error in Eq.1 where the 'c' is not defined actually, I believe you
mean 'chOff'.
Besides, I have two questions referring the usage of minimal cell.
1. What if the selective jamming applied on the
