Hi,
I am having trouble getting Plan 9 to recognize my ethernet card in my
embarrassingly old Dell laptop. The card is a Farallon Enet, which to the
best of my knowledge would be a "3C589" type for the purposes of plan9.ini.
I have tried some variations in plan9.ini, such as ether0=type=3C589 or
e
> /sys/src/cmd/dict/dict.c states:
> /*
> * Assumed index file structure: lines of form
> *[^\t]+\t[0-9]+
> * First field is key, second is byte offset into dictionary.
> * Should be sorted with args -u -t' ' +0f -1 +0 -1 +1n -2
> */
>
> whereas, /sys/src/cmd/dict/mkindex outputs:
>
>
i've sometimes thought that the trick used by #d etc could
be made more transparent by providing a genuine capability
service for fds, in the form of a system call, for instance
getfdcap(int fd, char *buf, int len)
then instead of just writing the fd itself, you'd write
the capability - thus th
> learly there was some post processing.
> why do you need to regenerate the index?
garr. reply to myself.
there are a number of awk and rc scripts in
the directory. it would be a good quick
project to put the pieces together in the
mkfile, but i think some of the pieces are
missing. the would
>Things like
> term% cd '#|'
> term% pwd
> #|
>just don't seem right.
you ask for fish; you get fish.
what's the trouble?
I know most everyone here hates the Itanium, but it is in some pretty large and
fast systems, and it's on the Top500 list.
So out of curiosity, has anyone looked at putting together a compiler for
Itanium, or otherwise looked at a Plan 9 port?
> According to the Plan9 wiki, the above results indicate that recognition for
> this card isn't built into the kernel, which leads me to my main question:
alternately, the card was not detected.
> What modification(s), if any, would I need to make to the kernel config file
> (9pcf)? This card ty
On Jan 5, 2009, at 3:00 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
Things like
term% cd '#|'
term% pwd
#|
just don't seem right.
you ask for fish; you get fish.
what's the trouble?
I supposed this is a matter of taste. There's as little
trouble with the above as with //foo != /foo on certain
legacy system
On Jan 4, 2009, at 9:12 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
Well, I guess I really got spoiled by ZFS's ability to do things like
$ zfs snapshot pool/projects/f...@yourtextgoeshere
and especially:
$ zfs clone pool/projects/f...@yourtextgoeshere pool/projects/
branch
I'm still trying to figure out
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Benjamin Huntsman
wrote:
> I know most everyone here hates the Itanium, but it is in some pretty large
> and fast systems, and it's on the Top500 list.
if you mean thunder, that machine is getting turned off soon. What new
machines have made it on top500? Sorry I
Cool! Looks like I found a "bi-lingual" person! ;-) Andrey,
would you mind if I ask you to translate some other things
between ZFS and venti/fossil for me?
On Jan 4, 2009, at 9:24 PM, andrey mirtchovski wrote:
Well, I guess I really got spoiled by ZFS's ability to do things like
$ zfs snapshot
Regarding the dict index files, what I understand is that dict(7)
receives a pattern (may also be a byte offset or whatever, but suppose
pattern), looks it up in the first fields of the lines in the dict
index, and uses the corresponding byte offset in the index to find the
full line in the dict fi
12 matches
Mail list logo