Has anyone gotten fossil (with or without venti) working on p9p, or
tried and failed?
I've been playing around with a variety of 9vx configurations and want
to try booting it off a p9p-hosted fossil (on the same physical box).
That's the next project.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:01 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
i assumed that ron was talking about c.
Yeah, that's what I thought. Sorry, Russ.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkl5E1IACgkQuv7AVNQDs+xctgCggzbkwZ8Epuu
>> cpu% mount -n /mnt/term/srv/sources /n/sources
>>
>> !Adding key: dom=outside.plan9.bell-labs.com proto=p9sk1
>> user[nwf]:
>
> Why is the terminal able to use /srv/sources to mount /n/sources but the cpu
> server isn't able to use exportfs's access to /srv/sources to do the same?
mount -n does
I don't undrestand what's going on here:
> term% 9fs sources
> post...
> term% ls -l /n/sources
> d-rwxrwxr-x M 38 9grid 9grid 0 Oct 20 2005 /n/sources/9grid
> ...
>
> term% cpu -h phlogiston.acm.jhu.edu
> cpu% mount -n /mnt/term/srv/sources /n/sources
>
> !Adding key: dom=outside.plan9.be
Erik got it. That code originally was written for a 1s complement
machine, the CDC 7200 I believe. I get a kick out of it every time I
see something and remember machines with + and - 0 :-)
ron
On Thu Jan 22 17:55:55 EST 2009, r...@swtch.com wrote:
> >> <- is a unary operator.
>
> > okay, what does it do? (unless you meant -> in C++)
>
> it receives from a channel.
i assumed that ron was talking about c.
in c, "<- 0" tokenizes as "<", "-", and "0".
"-" is taken to be a unary operator o
>> <- is a unary operator.
> okay, what does it do? (unless you meant -> in C++)
it receives from a channel.
russ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 22, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Russ Cox wrote:
<- is a unary operator.
okay, what does it do? (unless you meant -> in C++)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkl47zYACgkQuv7AVNQDs+wr7ACgi7QtQv4m4TweJlyzLFSHUs
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM, ron minnich wrote:
> I ask this every time I hit this piece of code, I think. But what the heck:
>
> if(seed <- 0)
>seed = seed + m_31;
>
> what's wrong with this code?
<- is a unary operator.
russ
On Thu Jan 22 15:55:09 EST 2009, rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
> I ask this every time I hit this piece of code, I think. But what the heck:
>
> if(seed <- 0)
> seed = seed + m_31;
>
> what's wrong with this code?
supposing the code does what it is supposed
to on some machines, i would guess t
I ask this every time I hit this piece of code, I think. But what the heck:
if(seed <- 0)
seed = seed + m_31;
what's wrong with this code?
ron
>I would never have picked it up without having it pointed out to me.
to be fair, in one of the system include files it was commented as
ino.h: time_t di_ctime; /* time created */
but it was only a comment. stat(2) was more accurate.
On Thu Jan 22 14:33:05 EST 2009, 9f...@hamnavoe.com wrote:
> > will the real creation time please stand up.
>
> October 23, 4004 BC.
so when we add 8-byte times to 9p2010 Tstat
and Wstat, we can add a constant ctime field of
-188466825600? or should that just be hardcoded?
- erik
> will the real creation time please stand up.
October 23, 4004 BC.
> Does Plan 9 really not provide for file creation?
no, but it wasn't really creation on unix but inode change.
> useful or not, traditional unix ctime never gave the creation time
> anyway - it gave inode modification time, which isn't the
> same thing at all: it's updated when you do a chmod.
Well, that is understandable, if contrary to the principle of least
astonishment. Thank you for that gem, I would
On Thu Jan 22 13:17:59 EST 2009, rogpe...@gmail.com wrote:
> 2009/1/22 :
> > I do wonder why this field was sacrificed in the file system(s) and
> > 9P*?
>
> useful or not, traditional unix ctime never gave the creation time
> anyway - it gave inode modification time, which isn't the
> same thing
2009/1/22 :
> I do wonder why this field was sacrificed in the file system(s) and
> 9P*?
useful or not, traditional unix ctime never gave the creation time
anyway - it gave inode modification time, which isn't the
same thing at all: it's updated when you do a chmod.
On Thu Jan 22 12:54:14 EST 2009, lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> > use the dump, luke. ☺
>
> If there was an easy, foolproof way to scan the dump by filename, I
> presume I could search for the earliest instance and consider that the
> time of creation. Not entirely viable, is it?
it's hard to giv
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:50 AM, wrote:
>> use the dump, luke. ☺
>
> If there was an easy, foolproof way to scan the dump by filename, I
> presume I could search for the earliest instance and consider that the
> time of creation. Not entirely viable, is it?
>
history(1)
http://plan9.bell-labs
> use the dump, luke. ☺
If there was an easy, foolproof way to scan the dump by filename, I
presume I could search for the earliest instance and consider that the
time of creation. Not entirely viable, is it?
I do wonder why this field was sacrificed in the file system(s) and
9P*?
Or am I dream
On Thu Jan 22 12:41:10 EST 2009, lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> Does Plan 9 really not provide for file creation?
>
> typedef
> struct Dir {
> /* system-modified data */
> ushort type; /* server type */
> uintdev;/* server subtype */
Does Plan 9 really not provide for file creation?
typedef
struct Dir {
/* system-modified data */
ushort type; /* server type */
uintdev;/* server subtype */
/* file data */
Qid qid;/
If I remember, when you visit Israel, they put an additional paper in your
passport. This paper is removed when you leave the country. Then ... your
passport do not have any stamp of Israel ... and you will not have
problems visit other countries.
Saludos,
kix.
>> I wonder how much flack I would
> I wonder how much flack I would get from Israeli passport control for
> the stamps in my passport. :)
What makes you think you'll be allowed back into those countries after
visiting Israel? :-)
++L
I don't know but that's a good group of people on the committee. I
expect they'd be open to more than the usual "how I got linux to be
power aware" type papers ...
ron
I wonder how much flack I would get from Israeli passport control for
the stamps in my passport. :)
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Akshat Kumar
wrote:
> which homie in the hood is going to represent?
>
> yo
> ak
>
>
which homie in the hood is going to represent?
yo
ak
28 matches
Mail list logo
