It seems I'm hitting this error when sending some GET requests:
In /sys/src/cmd/webfs/url.c:
if(strstr(url, %00)){
werrstr(escaped NUL in URI);
return -1;
}
I haven't fully understood the comment above, especially if it is against
the RFC to
2009/3/27 erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net:
It seems I'm hitting this error when sending some GET requests:
In /sys/src/cmd/webfs/url.c:
if(strstr(url, %00)){
werrstr(escaped NUL in URI);
return -1;
}
I haven't fully understood the comment
Ok, thanks to both. In the meanwhile, mjl pointed me to
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt, sect. 7.3, where this can found:
Note, however, that the %00 percent-encoding
(NUL) may require special handling and should be rejected if the
application is not expecting to receive raw data within a
Yeah, there aren't any. That's the point of URL encoding; NULL bytes
are as acceptable as any other, and your client should be able to
handle them -- so I think that webfs check is just bogus. It should
just encode it as a \0 and pass it through.
(you do mean %00 should result in a byte with
2009/3/27 erik quanstrom quans...@coraid.com:
Yeah, there aren't any. That's the point of URL encoding; NULL bytes
are as acceptable as any other, and your client should be able to
handle them -- so I think that webfs check is just bogus. It should
just encode it as a \0 and pass it through.
assuming that every application that uses webfs is prepared
to handle a null byte in the middle of a string. what webfs does
— complaining loudly — is much preferrable to programs misbehaving
silently. since it's quite likely that plan 9 applications are not
going to properly deal with
Hello everybody,
I noticed there are some thoughts about using plan9 on supercomputers.
For me supercomputers are usually used to do some heavy calculations.
And this leads me to a question. What software is then used for
programming these calculations? (I mean e.g. linear algebra, i.e.
matrix,
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Rudolf Sykora rudolf.syk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I noticed there are some thoughts about using plan9 on supercomputers.
For me supercomputers are usually used to do some heavy calculations.
And this leads me to a question. What software is then
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Pietro Gagliardi pietr...@mac.com wrote:
A 9vx, p9p or inferno cocoa port is a project that seems fairly
I can do one of these; which is the most needed/wanted?
Personally I have no preference, any of the three would be great to
have, probably the p9p one is
Some of us have been thinking about a 'sane' subset of HTTP plus some
conventions, that could reasonably map to 9p.
The main issue is the huge amounts of crud in the HTTP spec and how to
pick the sensible bits and discard the rest while remaining compatible
with existing implementations; the main
If you take the right approach you should be able to pave the way for
all three. Just keep the interface modular and implement the hooks
for the target you are most comfortable with.
-eric
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 27, 2009, at 8:21 PM, Uriel urie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26,
On 03/27/09 14:31, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
Hello everybody,
I noticed there are some thoughts about using plan9 on supercomputers.
For me supercomputers are usually used to do some heavy calculations.
And this leads me to a question. What software is then used for
programming these calculations?
Just a suggestion,
A good forth system using acme, probably based on fgb's 4th. The goal
is to conquer the Seaforth chip.
I know the dev kit is US$500 but their compiler and simulator, written
in forth, doesn't need hardware.
And at least two 9fans have a kit.
brucee
Entertaining. Indented lines are fossil console; nonindented are at a
normal CPU prompt.
cpu% 9fs
9fs: venti i/o error or wrong score, block
558b88fbae4e0aa894c614fb3eeccf4d2f7492ca
main: venti tcp!xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx!x
cpu% 9fs
9fs: venti i/o error or wrong score, block
On Mar 24, 2009, at 5:51 AM, roger peppe wrote:
http://www.classhat.com/tymaPaulMultithread.pdf
Java has its own share of issues when it comes to multithreading, I'd
rather see a presentation like that from the sort of guys who do
VoIP servers in C/C++ and things like that.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mar 27, 2009, at 6:36 PM, Uriel wrote:
Some of us have been thinking about a 'sane' subset of HTTP plus some
conventions, that could reasonably map to 9p.
Interestingly enough, that's exactly the quest I'm on. I'd appreciate
a chance
of talking to likeminded folks.
The main issue is
16 matches
Mail list logo
