>> right on schedule!
>>
>> http://9fans.net/archive/2001/05/482 (may 31 2001)
>> http://9fans.net/archive/2005/05/69 (may 7 2005)
>
> okay, that timing's just freaky.
And I keep missing the crucial message :-(
Freaky, definitely. Thanks for the explanation. Specially to Jim :-)
++L
> right on schedule!
>
> http://9fans.net/archive/2001/05/482 (may 31 2001)
> http://9fans.net/archive/2005/05/69 (may 7 2005)
okay, that timing's just freaky.
> I still can't figure what "typestr" does in the C compiler!
right on schedule!
http://9fans.net/archive/2001/05/482 (may 31 2001)
http://9fans.net/archive/2005/05/69 (may 7 2005)
russ
Noweb has a nice simple interface (if literate programming
is what you want) and runs on Plan 9. It's somewhere:
I'm sure if you dig around you can find it. Maybe it's in
/n/sources/extra. I used it quite a bit with latex. I don't
remember whether I ever used it with troff.
Russ
> /* exchange random numbers */
> srand(truerand());
> for(i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> key[i+12] = rand();
if one really cared, the right thing to do
would be fastrand() calls.
truerand is only for things that absolutely
must be random (not pseudo-random)
or for seeding random number gener
We just got the notice from Google. There are a lot of applicants
under 18 --> automatic disqualification. Student applicants, please
verify your personal information.
Thanks
ron
On 4/10/09, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been thinking about 'well documented programs' and come across
> the 'noweb' program.
> Do you have any experience with literal programming and, particularly,
> noweb?
> (I noticed at least rsc seems to have played with it back in the year
> 2000.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 04:53:44PM +0200, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> In contrast, noweb tried to be simpler, with no tight connection to
> the language used (any language can be used) and no tight connection
> to the formatter.
and no tight connection with any usage either.
[Sorry, couldn't resist s
in the process of trying to make smtpd reject email with garbage
characters in the headers, i ran headlong into a few long standing
smtpd annoyances.
smtpd has had an annoying habit of delivering empty messages
when bad things happen, like sender timeout.
it turns out that the problem is that wri
> Just curious... what's the relation to Cweb and Ctangle (the ones Knuth uses)?
>
> From what I've heard of those (even from Knuth himself) is that
> they're too ugly to use very much, and fits well with Knuth's style,
> which is mostly the "giant blob of code" style.
As far as I can tell, cweb (
No, bash's completion system is what's responsible for line numbers in
the thousands.
How? Is bash's completion on your system different than on my system? I'd
like you to substantiate that statement and will thank you for a proper
response.
--On Friday, April 10, 2009 3:33 PM -0400 "J.R. Ma
>> Makes perfect sense for Chapman's purposes. Replace steel
>> with aluminium. Fiberglass instead of sheet metal and so on.
>> Unfortunately we don't have exact analogs in s/w. We can
>> only simplicate; we can't add lightness!
>
> read ken's code!
I still can't figure what "typestr" does in t
I implemented a mkernel using noweb. In the end, I think it's harder
to follow than placing the code and doc appart. Probably a religious
issue.
El 11/04/2009, a las 0:43, rudolf.syk...@gmail.com escribió:
Hello,
I've been thinking about 'well documented programs' and come across
the 'nowe
13 matches
Mail list logo
