my father danced with his great aunt.
-rob
i'd do that for a dollar.
On 1/20/10, Rob Pike robp...@gmail.com wrote:
my father danced with his great aunt.
-rob
By the end of May, all the root servers should be running DNSSEC
http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/19/the-internet-is-about-to-get-a-lot-safer/
Is Plan9 ready for such a move?
On Wed Jan 20 08:27:58 EST 2010, maht-9f...@maht0x0r.net wrote:
By the end of May, all the root servers should be running DNSSEC
http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/19/the-internet-is-about-to-get-a-lot-safer/
Is Plan9 ready for such a move?
there are two answers to this:
yes, if you mean by
On Jan 20, 2010, at 8:42 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net
wrote:
On Wed Jan 20 08:27:58 EST 2010, maht-9f...@maht0x0r.net wrote:
By the end of May, all the root servers should be running DNSSEC
http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/19/the-internet-is-about-to-get-a-lot-safer/
Is
one would likely need to start with a different structure
than ndb/dns currently has to get dnssec. but i think that
the most of the query logic could be reused.
As I understand it; It is an extension, the base DNS stuff should not
change.
What would need to be changed in ndb, or would
starting over would seem (and probably is) best.
http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html
Hi,
I updated http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/contrib/maht/httpd/* to
sync with current source
/n/sources/contrib/maht/httpd/*
It adds -N option to stop it dropping to none which you have to be the
hostowner to kill
and logs any 404's to /sys/log/httpd/log
I tried to see if it's in
On Wed Jan 20 12:49:14 EST 2010, r...@swtch.com wrote:
starting over would seem (and probably is) best.
http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html
you have a design then that will
do dnssec without any rewriting?
- erik
As soon as I posted patch came back
I've submitted it as httpd-none and changed -N to -u to match a
different patch that does the same thing for another program
On Jan 20, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Russ Cox r...@swtch.com wrote:
starting over would seem (and probably is) best.
http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html
Given the small amount of information I had...
I havent even looked at the source yet...
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Justin Jackson jjackson...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been lurking for the past few months and I've really enjoyed
reading the messages from this list. I'm looking for some ideas or
advice---here's the story: I'm pursuing a Master's degree in computer
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:17 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@coraid.com wrote:
On Wed Jan 20 12:49:14 EST 2010, r...@swtch.com wrote:
starting over would seem (and probably is) best.
http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html
you have a design then that will
do dnssec without any rewriting?
i
Aren't DirectShow filter graphs and programs like GraphStudio/GraphEdit one
possible answer to the video processing question? Filter graphs can be
generated by any program, GUI or CLI, and fed to DirectShow provided one
learns the in and out of generating them.
The OP's question, too, finds
On Jan 20, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Eris Discordia eris.discor...@gmail.com
wrote:
Aren't DirectShow filter graphs and programs like GraphStudio/
GraphEdit one possible answer to the video processing question?
Filter graphs can be generated by any program, GUI or CLI, and fed
to DirectShow
my father danced with his great aunt.
OK, so I'm too old and senile and stupid to work out what a great aunt
is, although I'm pretty sure it's not the same as a third cousin twice
removed. Couldn't you just tell us her name?
16 matches
Mail list logo
