Re: [9fans] Go Plan 9

2011-04-02 Thread Rob Pike
We'll get the Plan 9 implementation up to scratch. It's not there yet, though. Once things look solid we'll need a volunteer to set up a builder so we can automatically make sure the Plan 9 port stays current. -rob

Re: [9fans] Go Plan 9

2011-04-02 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
Thank you! FYI, I'm building on Ubungo 10.10, I'm getting several packages that aren't building (io/ioutil, tabwriter, time - so far); most seem to be lack of or conflict in definitions in os.* and syscall.*. Is this expected? This just gave me more ammunition to convince some Seattle Gophers tha

Re: [9fans] Go Plan 9

2011-04-02 Thread andrey mirtchovski
http://codereview.appspot.com/4316054 :)

Re: [9fans] Go Plan 9

2011-04-02 Thread ron minnich
Things went badly here: 8g -o _go_.8 exp.go normal.go rand.go rng.go zipf.go gopack grc _obj/hash/crc32.a _go_.8 match.go:45: undefined: Separator match.go:62: undefined: Separator match.go:160: undefined: Separator match.go:227: undefined: Separator path.go:18: undefined: Separator path.go:19: un

Re: [9fans] Go Plan 9

2011-04-02 Thread andrey mirtchovski
cross-compilation (GOOS=plan9, GOARCH=386, link with -s), but there are a few issues -- the build fails at crypto, so fmt is not compiled. for a hello world you need to manually make install pkg/strconv and pkg/reflect and pkg/fmt.

Re: [9fans] Go Plan 9

2011-04-02 Thread ron minnich
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, ron minnich wrote: > On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:52 PM, David Leimbach wrote: >> So wait... We can get the toolchain built on plan 9. Or we can target plan 9 >> via cross compiler?  Either way is pretty awesome!  Nice work! > > I'm trying a cross-build now i.e. I se

Re: [9fans] Go Plan 9

2011-04-02 Thread ron minnich
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:52 PM, David Leimbach wrote: > So wait... We can get the toolchain built on plan 9. Or we can target plan 9 > via cross compiler?  Either way is pretty awesome!  Nice work! I'm trying a cross-build now ron

Re: [9fans] Go Plan 9

2011-04-02 Thread David Leimbach
So wait... We can get the toolchain built on plan 9. Or we can target plan 9 via cross compiler? Either way is pretty awesome! Nice work! Sent from my iPhone On Apr 2, 2011, at 4:00 PM, andrey mirtchovski wrote: > Congratulations on the hard work and thanks for seeing this through! >

Re: [9fans] Go Plan 9

2011-04-02 Thread andrey mirtchovski
Congratulations on the hard work and thanks for seeing this through!

[9fans] Go Plan 9

2011-04-02 Thread Pavel Zholkover
Hi all! Rob just committed my syscall and os Plan 9 patches into mainline. The produced binaries do not run properly on 9vx since the last gc changes so its native or kvm+qemu etc. Please test :) Pavel

Re: [9fans] acme mail arrival time wrong in faces

2011-04-02 Thread Sasha and Tanya Kapshuk
On 04/02/2011 05:33 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: The time got updated everywhere else but in the faces. When an email arrives, the time it arrived is ok in acme mail, but not in faces. if $timezone differs for faces, then it will display different times/dates. if you change the timezone, did

Re: [9fans] acme mail arrival time wrong in faces

2011-04-02 Thread erik quanstrom
> The time got updated everywhere else but in the faces. When an email > arrives, the time it arrived is ok in acme mail, but not in faces. if $timezone differs for faces, then it will display different times/dates. if you change the timezone, did you resart faces? both acme Mail and faces beli