do you mean 'graph', or 'chart' ?
++pac
Hi all
what are our plan9 option for making colored graphs for troff documents?
I am guessing this how it's going to be done
create graph using pure postscript -> troff -mpictures -> page
is there any other option?
fernan
Even on Plan 9 proper (that is, bare hardware?
how about virtualized on qemu or VMWare, etc.)?
ak
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:49 PM, ron minnich wrote:
> Hi, it's me, the repeating person (I almost said "broken record" but
> I'm not sure how many people know what that means any more :-)
>
> Sugge
Thanks! All implementations works now.
A typo fix in Go implementation was not enough. You can't write
message by parts, have to form it in buffer before writing.
ratrace helped to find problem with Ruby/Python implementations.
https://gist.github.com/912377#file_ratrace.log shows that both
writ
>> PS: I still can't link an executable with the version of 8l from the
>> Go toolchain that I built under Plan 9, but I'm hoping to get there
>> soon.
>
> It's of some consolation to me that I see exactly the same results
> under Ubuntu, so that particular problem isn't in the 8l executable
> cre
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:44 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>>> the way to do this is
>>>cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk && mk clean
>>
>> Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
>> the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk asks what to make
In article ,
Greg Comeau wrote:
>As mentioned in a post yesterday, we seem to have succeeded in getting
>5c et al built. However, in resuming playing around at least one case
>/bin/ape/sh is producing:
>
>./command-name[3]: other-command-name: cannot execute - Access Denied
>
>since doing the mk'
> PS: I still can't link an executable with the version of 8l from the
> Go toolchain that I built under Plan 9, but I'm hoping to get there
> soon.
It's of some consolation to me that I see exactly the same results
under Ubuntu, so that particular problem isn't in the 8l executable
created for Pl
> >the way to do this is
> > cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk && mk clean
>
> Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
> the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk asks what to make,
> and so I tried 'mk all' which is saying 5c does not exist, but
> that's one
> Also, in a previous question (http://groups.google.com/group/
> comp.os.plan9/browse_thread/thread/771294cf1d34c337) it was stated
> that streams are no longer used. So what's the present mechanism that
> replaces streams?
there isn't one. you can't dynamically reconfigure i/o paths in plan 9.
I have tweaked the Plan 9 native to allow for manual adjustment
around the different needs of Go and native Plan 9 toolchains, so now:
#ifndef SARNAME
#define SARNAME 16
#endif
SARNAME can be predefined to the "64" that Go prefers. Unfortunately,
it's a short term soluti
>>the way to do this is
>> cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk && mk clean
>
> Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
> the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk asks what to make,
> and so I tried 'mk all' which is saying 5c does not exist, but
> that's one
In article ,
ron minnich wrote:
>I regularly build kernels and full bins for arm on 9vx. the biggest
>issue with osx is when you install 9vx on a case-insenstive file
>system: things like /bin/Kill and /bin/kill don't quite work out.
Thanks for the heads up, I seem to have run into this trying
to
>From "The Organization of Networks in Plan 9":
a. "Asynchronous communications channels such as pipes, TCP
conversations, Datakit conversations, and RS232 lines are implemented
using streams."
b. "Streams remain in our kernel because we are unable to devise a
better alternative."
Also, in a pre
In article <784be5fe9a0079d80a76434d252dd...@coraid.com>,
erik quanstrom wrote:
>> 2) If I recall as it was installed a while ago it came with 8c/8l and
>>respective includes/libs already available. However, things like
>>5c and its requirements do not seem to be available by default.
>>
In article <90f71fcedeb5b45a5bed515862b8a...@hamnavoe.com>,
Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote:
>> 1) If it is upgraded to latest version of Snow Leopard (I think 10.6.3?),
>>will anything regarding 9vx.OSX break?
>
>As far as I can tell, 9vx works fine on MacOSX 10.6.7.
Great, 9vx is s
In article <784be5fe9a0079d80a76434d252dd...@coraid.com>,
erik quanstrom wrote:
>> 2) If I recall as it was installed a while ago it came with 8c/8l and
>>respective includes/libs already available. However, things like
>>5c and its requirements do not seem to be available by default.
>>
As mentioned in a post yesterday, we seem to have succeeded in getting
5c et al built. However, in resuming playing around at least one case
/bin/ape/sh is producing:
./command-name[3]: other-command-name: cannot execute - Access Denied
since doing the mk's. Obviously something in those builds
18 matches
Mail list logo
