On 04/29/11 00:21, Brian L. Stuart wrote:
> Ron wrote:
>> andrey mirtchovski
>>
>> wrote:
This is great!
>>>
>>> it is, isn't it? 6 seconds kernel compile, 15 seconds
>> turnaround time
>>> when developing anything in the kernel (with PXE
>> boot). beat that,
>>> modern operating systems :)
>
On 3 kvě, 10:33, roo...@gmail.com (Sergey Kornilovich) wrote:
> So far, everything looks like a bug in the dns ...
> Does anyone have ideas how to fix the situation?
The behavior is very similar to my problematic situation:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.plan9/browse_thread/thread/a6aeb2ea
Is there any way someone could post a binary of rminnich's vx32/9vx
for Mac OS X 10.6/Intel to the bitbucket site at
https://bitbucket.org/rminnich/vx32,
or provide detailed instructions on how to build it for a non-
programmer?
I use 9vx 0.12 to run sam, but I am not a programmer, so I haven't
b
In article ,
Greg Comeau wrote:
>In article ,
>Greg Comeau wrote:
>>In article ,
>>Greg Comeau wrote:
>>>As mentioned in a post yesterday, we seem to have succeeded in getting
>>>5c et al built. However, in resuming playing around at least one case
>>>/bin/ape/sh is producing:
>>>./command-name
On 04/26/11 12:03, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
>
> On 24 Apr 2011, at 9:16 am, hiro wrote:
>
>> In http://plan9.bell-labs.com/robots.txt you will find:
>>
>> User-agent: *
>> Disallow: /
>
> *facepalm* I wondered if this was the case; didn't think to check.
> Anyone have any idea why this is ther
On Apr 30, 6:08 am, smi...@zenzebra.mv.com wrote:
> Has anybody come across a ThinkPad that ISN'T well-supported by Plan 9?
> IBM TPs are notorious for being Linux-friendly; it makes sense that
> they'd tend to be 9-friendly, too.
I have a Thinkpad X31: http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Category:X31.
In article ,
Jacob Todd wrote:
>On Apr 29, 2011 6:21 AM, "errno" wrote:
>> On Friday, April 29, 2011 02:18:26 AM Charles Forsyth wrote:
>> > > complaining is because you _need_ linux... to furnish all the things
>> > > you can't do with plan 9 - either personally, or within your
>> > > organizati
man nm shows a symbol type of L that is possible denoting it as
a "leaf function text segment symbol". Often a leaf function
is distinguished by being at the end of a call hierarchy and
can sometimes yield difference in code generation regarding
stack space and such. Is this the case here? If s
> > Life is too short to configure and compile Linux and
> > GNU software.
>
> And they people (the developers, distributions as well as users),
> however, are doing it since 1991 :P
so in conclusion, perhaps one of the following is true
- linux has gotten slowly worse over the years,
- some peop
Greg Comeau once said:
> man nm shows a symbol type of L that is possible denoting it as
> a "leaf function text segment symbol". Often a leaf function
> is distinguished by being at the end of a call hierarchy and
> can sometimes yield difference in code generation regarding
> stack space and s
> I completed the installation. When I rebooted I got the same error
> with the graphic card as I got in the live mode. I think editing the
> 9fat.ini should resolve the problem, but I have to learn how to edit
> files in Plan9 without rio. The graphic card is not supported (I think
> so: http://
On Wed May 4 07:46:40 EDT 2011, pavel.klinkov...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 3 kvě, 10:33, roo...@gmail.com (Sergey Kornilovich) wrote: > So
> far, everything looks like a bug in the dns ... > Does anyone have
> ideas how to fix the situation?
>
> The behavior is very similar to my problematic situati
it should be as simple as 'make 9vx/9vx' issued in vx32/src.
here's a binary i just compiled:
http://mirtchovski.com/p9/9vx.OSX.gz
andrey
On 4 May 2011, at 11:40 am, Balwinder S Dheeman wrote:
On 04/26/11 12:03, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
On 24 Apr 2011, at 9:16 am, hiro wrote:
In http://plan9.bell-labs.com/robots.txt you will find:
User-agent: *
Disallow: /
*facepalm* I wondered if this was the case; didn't think to check
what's weird is I'm just not seeing any of these problems. Good fun.
ron
On 4 May 2011, at 3:00 pm, andrey mirtchovski wrote:
it should be as simple as 'make 9vx/9vx' issued in vx32/src.
knowing the right make target was the stumbling block for me too, a
few months ago. I'm thinking it should be documented. the ADVENTURE
file gives wrong instructions (cd src;
On Wednesday 04 of May 2011 17:37:41 Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> On 4 May 2011, at 11:40 am, Balwinder S Dheeman wrote:
> > On 04/26/11 12:03, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> >> On 24 Apr 2011, at 9:16 am, hiro wrote:
> >>> In http://plan9.bell-labs.com/robots.txt you will find:
> >>>
> >>> User-age
> > it should be as simple as 'make 9vx/9vx' issued in
> vx32/src.
>
> knowing the right make target was the stumbling block for
> me too, a few months ago. I'm thinking it should be
> documented. the ADVENTURE file gives wrong instructions (cd
> src; make; make install)
That's what makes it an A
On Wed, 04 May 2011 08:00:59 MDT andrey mirtchovski
wrote:
> it should be as simple as 'make 9vx/9vx' issued in vx32/src.
>
> here's a binary i just compiled:
>
> http://mirtchovski.com/p9/9vx.OSX.gz
Here are some instructions I sent someone last week which may
be of help:
# Note: UNTESTED b
On Wed, 04 May 2011 09:56:30 PDT Bakul Shah wrote:
> # I assume people know how to install pythong and mercurial!
er... I meant python! Pythong seems like something Natassja Kinski
wore in the eighties.
In article <271f1d4632de477f20e2dfe627cfd...@brasstown.quanstro.net> you write:
>at coraid, we're considering asking new hires use ed for
>a week exclusively.
As the only real Unix/Linux expert at my previous company, I used to tell
people that the way to really learn to become comfortable as a co
On Wed May 4 15:32:42 EDT 2011, arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
> In article <271f1d4632de477f20e2dfe627cfd...@brasstown.quanstro.net> you
> write:
> >at coraid, we're considering asking new hires use ed for
> >a week exclusively.
>
> As the only real Unix/Linux expert at my previous company, I used to
dexen deVries writes:
> I believe we need an ``Allow: /'' below the long list of `Disallows' in the
> User-agent: Googlebot, User-agent: msnbot section. Otherwise, only the final
> ``Disallow: /'' matches, and in effecet, every robot is cut off.
I rather like mine own robots.txt (http://www.ic
>> >at coraid, we're considering asking new hires use ed for
>> >a week exclusively.
sam -d allowed? :)
-- vs
24 matches
Mail list logo
