On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Lucio De Re wrote:
> It is possible to cross-compile Go on Linux for Plan 9, the details are
> a bit vague and I, for one, would not mind somebody rehashing them here
> or providing a pointer to them.
I have a script shown below that I source. Then, running ./make
http://groups.google.com/group/golang-dev/browse_thread/thread/c44be49fe9ca42e7/cb98571d81888b9f?lnk=gst&q=plan9front#cb98571d81888b9f
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:59:08PM -0300, stephano zanzin wrote:
>
> Great! I just came to the list today looking for some content about Go in
> p9, I'll code many stuff in Go and was wondering if it was ported. Count me
> in for testing and would be much appreciated if you highlight what have bee
Great! I just came to the list today looking for some content about Go in
p9, I'll code many stuff in Go and was wondering if it was ported. Count me
in for testing and would be much appreciated if you highlight what have been
done to bring 386 Go over Plan 9.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Luci
Russ Cox wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Yaroslav wrote:
Is the software which powers 9fans web archive publicly available?
it's not.
ahem... let me put on my pedantic shoes...
9fans.net/archive wrote:
> "powered by grep(1) "
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Yaroslav wrote:
> Is the software which powers 9fans web archive publicly available?
it's not.
Is the software which powers 9fans web archive publicly available?
On Thursday 14 July 2011 19:12:23 Yaroslav wrote:
> do we really need screens? lets move everything into our imagination.
> all we need is to get a draw(3) interface to it...
can't wait till the first person gets ghosthacked [1], eh?
nb., PostScript is turing-complete, if lacking a bit on the I/O
do we really need screens? lets move everything into our imagination.
all we need is to get a draw(3) interface to it...