On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 12:18 -0400, Russ Cox wrote:
> i call this 'ventino'.
Shouldn't it be 'ventina'?
Venti seems feminine.
this is my script to do this, runs on the machine behind the firewall (larch)
and connects to the default file server.
#!/bin/rc
while(){
cpu -c 'rm -f /srv/larch ;
srvfs larch /mnt/term ;
while() sleep 600 '>[2] /dev/null
sleep 6
}
>As mentioned elsewhere, beware assinine five minute state timeouts in
>the NAT implementation.
with the new Netgear supplied by my cable company, I discovered (on a forum)
that switching off a supposed security option to do some form of packet
inspection had the pleasant effect of eliminating
If you port forward the ticket port to your auth server and the
exportfs port to your CPU server, you should be able to 'import
nathost ...' from the wilds of the Internet.
As mentioned elsewhere, beware assinine five minute state timeouts in
the NAT implementation. Push aan onto the connec
> We tried a Zotac IONITX-G-E board here but found that it didn't work
> with Plan 9... I don't remember what the problem was, probably either
> the ethernet or the SATA controller (the usual suspects).
both of those should work, i would think you'd have trouble with the crappy mp
mappings, etc.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Ruckdashel wrote:
> i'm looking at building a system to get my plan9 tinkering out of VMs.
> I'm looking at using a zotac Ionitx-t-u mobo with a sata ssd. I'm
> curious if any one has tried this mobo. I'm trying to avoid having
> another linux box lying around.
>
>
i call this 'ventino'. it's a tiny venti that keeps
the whole index in memory, backed by a text file.
i have not used it in a while (the file is dated may 25, 2009)
but hey, it's a working venti server in 329 lines of code.
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
ty
> What it may be? A connection lose?
that'd be my first guess. it is, unfortunately, not uncommon for
routers which do NAT (and some corporate firewalls) to close
idle connections on you. i used to have a cron script that
ran on the NATed system, cpu'd in, did the postroot, and then
hung around ru
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:50 AM, dexen deVries wrote:
> Venti would make a great backend for Git.
I guess you could do this; it'd be interesting to do something more in
keeping with the Unix model than git is.
Create repo:
dd -if etc. etc.
checkout
unvac
commit
vac etc.
compare two trees:
>
> [1] /n/sources/contrib/anothy/bin/rc/postroot
> [2] /n/sources/contrib/anothy/bin/rc/tun
>
>
Thank you. That is really helps. I learned about srv(3) and now understand
mine misconception.
I tested it all at work from NATed kvm and it all works. But I have problem
when tried postroot fro
On Fri Aug 12 04:53:43 EDT 2011, steve.ruckdas...@gmail.com wrote:
> i'm looking at building a system to get my plan9 tinkering out of VMs.
> I'm looking at using a zotac Ionitx-t-u mobo with a sata ssd. I'm
> curious if any one has tried this mobo. I'm trying to avoid having
> another linux box ly
> How much RAM needs the Fossil+Venti Fileserver in total?
For both Fossil and Venti, the default, in Plan 9, is to
use 20% of total user memory. These values are defined in
/sys/src/9/boot/local.c.
The minimum required memory is something like 1 MB for Fossil
and 45 MB for Venti.
Venti have thr
Many thanks! I will try it this weekend.
One additional question:
How much RAM needs the Fossil+Venti Fileserver in total?
-Bernd
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:11:27 +0200 David du Colombier
<0in...@gmail.com> wrote:
>In fact, it's pretty straightforward.
>
>In the following example, I consider you h
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:42:01 +0200 Ruckdashel
wrote:
>i'm looking at building a system to get my plan9 tinkering out of
>VMs.
>I'm looking at using a zotac Ionitx-t-u mobo with a sata ssd. I'm
>curious if any one has tried this mobo. I'm trying to avoid having
>another linux box lying around.
i'm looking at building a system to get my plan9 tinkering out of VMs.
I'm looking at using a zotac Ionitx-t-u mobo with a sata ssd. I'm
curious if any one has tried this mobo. I'm trying to avoid having
another linux box lying around.
On Thursday 11 of August 2011 18:15:09 ron minnich wrote:
> Could we make little venti files and finally try to build an SCM using
> these files?
Venti would make a great backend for Git. I believe Git's commit and tree
format are simple enough to be re-implemented, if porting proves to be too
b
16 matches
Mail list logo
