Re: [9fans] some pcc questions

2012-04-23 Thread Bakul Shah
On Apr 23, 2012, at 6:42 AM, erik quanstrom wrote: > crazy idea i haven't tried. > > why not use X in sam or acme to mass-edit fu:bar -> fu[bar] and just make > fu an array. ? How will that work for something like struct X {int a:5, :8, c:12,:7; float d;} x; Usually you can convert bitfields

Re: [9fans] nice terminal...

2012-04-23 Thread Matthew Veety
On Apr 23, 2012 10:07 AM, "Jeffrey Green" wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2012, at 10:51 PM, Bruce Ellis wrote: > > > "John Connor uses his 26th century technology to travel back in time, > > insisting that Sarah's destiny will be thwarted if she does not take > > the errata to the desert. They blow things

Re: [9fans] nice terminal...

2012-04-23 Thread Jeffrey Green
On Apr 22, 2012, at 10:51 PM, Bruce Ellis wrote: > "John Connor uses his 26th century technology to travel back in time, > insisting that Sarah's destiny will be thwarted if she does not take > the errata to the desert. They blow things up - not many dead. Sarah > latches onto a Cyborg open wifi a

Re: [9fans] some pcc questions

2012-04-23 Thread erik quanstrom
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Jens Staal wrote: > > > The second issue that I have been meaning to ask the list is about pcc > > and bitfields - are they supported or is this some sort of can of > > worms I have stepped into? > > > > Bitfields are allowed to have lots of *-defined behavior

Re: [9fans] some pcc questions

2012-04-23 Thread Comeau At9Fans
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Jens Staal wrote: > I have just hit another "pcc can not initialize bitfields" problem > with netsurf libcss. If anyone know how to tackle that issue (or if it > even CAN be tackled) it would be greatly appreciated > >From what I recall, it comes up when a bi

Re: [9fans] some pcc questions

2012-04-23 Thread Comeau At9Fans
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Jens Staal wrote: > The second issue that I have been meaning to ask the list is about pcc > and bitfields - are they supported or is this some sort of can of > worms I have stepped into? > Bitfields are allowed to have lots of *-defined behavior, so often they

Re: [9fans] SSHv2

2012-04-23 Thread rhoyerboat
On Apr 2, 8:31 pm, lyn...@orthanc.ca (Lyndon Nerenberg) wrote: > On 2012-04-02, at 7:27 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > > I haven't tried genning up a CPU kernel with the new factotum yet. > > Sorry, I meant to say "with Richard's patched original factotum." I haven't tried building a new pccpuf k