for portability.
--
iphone kbd. excuse typos :)
On May 11, 2012, at 3:50 AM, kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
Don't worry about that.
It was your several years ago works, and you are
doing another work now.
I'll walking around it for a more, because
also you get to write in a concurrent language that looks nice.
Inferno's hosting ability matters more, though, because it allows you to
convert any existing
system, running some other OS, into part of an Octopus system, and make
that host system's
resources available in the name space,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 07:30:25PM -0400, ge...@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
New PC bootstraps and manual pages will be arriving
on sources soon. Highlights include amd64 booting,
using kernel device drivers, better CD booting, and
the ability to run on a wider range of machines.
See the
On May 10, 2012, at 7:30 PM, ge...@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
New PC bootstraps and manual pages will be arriving
on sources soon. Highlights include amd64 booting,
using kernel device drivers, better CD booting, and
the ability to run on a wider range of machines.
See the upcoming manual
the multiple botch happens only when it tries isa tbdf and can probably
ignored?
i wonder why the first mpintrenablex() with the pci tbdf would fail. the
only case where it would fail that way without leaving some other kernel
print behind is when there is no matching pin (aintr-irq) entry
Hey, I got the solution to my annoying problem:
why it works anyway?
The plumber to plumb DSCN1549.jpg to page is not
the plumber to be run from $OCTOPUS/dis/o/termrc, but
the plumber done by wm/sh of inferno of the same file .
That's the reason why I have to change
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Stephen Wiley swwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 10, 2012, at 7:30 PM, ge...@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
New PC bootstraps and manual pages will be arriving
on sources soon. Highlights include amd64 booting,
using kernel device drivers, better CD booting,
From the IL Wikipedia page:
As of the Fourth Edition of Plan 9, 2003, IL is deprecated in favor of
TCP/IP because it doesn't handle long-distance connections well.
Does anybody still use IL? It sounds like an interesting protocol and I'm
wondering if anybody has or is still using it for
will do. btw, that cannot find southbridge is there forever. just
googled for PCI.255.31.7 or 255:31:7 and you get tons of results.
maybe that entry in the $PIR is just bogus/dummy?
--
cinap
Does anybody still use IL? It sounds like an interesting protocol
and I'm wondering if anybody has or is still using it for either
local network or internet usage. And, given It's depreciation
status, is it still available for use if one does want to use it?
I still use IL on my local
the set is at least as large as the number of people who have kenfs.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Burton Samograd
burton.samog...@markit.com wrote:
From the IL Wikipedia page:
As of the Fourth Edition of Plan 9, 2003, IL is deprecated in favor of
TCP/IP because it doesn't handle
I still use IL on my local network, but that's mostly for fun.
Does it offer the advantages claimed over TCP? Do you think it is even
possible to run it over the internet anymore given the amount of filtering and
such that is going on at the ISP level now?
--
Burton
This e-mail, including
Does it offer the advantages claimed over TCP? Do you think it is
even possible to run it over the internet anymore given the amount of
filtering and such that is going on at the ISP level now?
I think the main advantage of IL over TCP is its simplicity.
However, I wouldn't recommend using
Hey,
The explanation for IL's deprecation is originally from the Plan 9
fourth release notes [1]:
We are phasing out the IL protocol since it doesn’t handle long-distance
connections well (and long-distance networks don’t handle it well, either).
Does anyone know what it is about IL's design
On Fri May 11 12:43:42 EDT 2012, burton.samog...@markit.com wrote:
I still use IL on my local network, but that's mostly for fun.
Does it offer the advantages claimed over TCP? Do you think it is
yes, it does.
- erik
http://code.google.com/p/plan9front/source/detail?r=f31b07b59320acda22829bb12bac497cb5a29a69
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com wrote:
Hey,
The explanation for IL's deprecation is originally from the Plan 9
fourth release notes [1]:
We are phasing out the IL
Does anyone know what it is about IL's design that means it doesn't
handle long-distance connections well?
i can't think of anything that's inherent or fundamental to the protocol.
on the other hand, i don't use il over the internet since it's not encrypted.
tls over the internet makes much
i can't think of anything that's inherent or fundamental to the
protocol. on the other hand, i don't use il over the internet since
it's not encrypted. tls over the internet makes much more sense to me.
Can't you use TLS over IL?
--
David du Colombier
On Fri May 11 14:54:37 EDT 2012, 0in...@gmail.com wrote:
i can't think of anything that's inherent or fundamental to the
protocol. on the other hand, i don't use il over the internet since
it's not encrypted. tls over the internet makes much more sense to me.
Can't you use TLS over IL?
i
i don't use il over the internet since it's not encrypted.
tls over the internet makes much more sense to me.
Is there no encryption support for 9P?
- erik
This e-mail, including accompanying communications and attachments, is strictly
confidential and only for the intended recipient. Any
Oops, that wasn't from eric...
i don't use il over the internet since it's not encrypted.
tls over the internet makes much more sense to me.
Is there no encryption support for 9P?
--
Burton Samograd
This e-mail, including accompanying communications and attachments, is strictly
confidential
Is there no encryption support for 9P?
cpu(1), import(4) and exportfs(4) supports optional
encryption using the ssl(3) record layer.
--
David du Colombier
On Fri May 11 17:04:04 EDT 2012, 0in...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there no encryption support for 9P?
cpu(1), import(4) and exportfs(4) supports optional
encryption using the ssl(3) record layer.
using tcp. there is no reason support for tls/il/ip couldn't
have been added, but it was not.
-
9boot(8) is the place to start. 9boot replaces 9pxeload but is more
persistent. 9load and 9loadusb should behave much as the old ones
did, though I hope that the new ones will run on more machines. One
can boot through any PCI ethernet interface for which we have a kernel
driver now.
We are
Does anyone know what it is about IL's design that means it doesn't
handle long-distance connections well?
congestion control, and NATP. the latter isn't IL's design, but IP's, or
NAT's, or both.
Hello,
I am wondering what is happening when I hold down the Alt/Meta key
when I press characters. If I hit Alt-B+B I get something that looks
like a bomb. The other keys I've tried just look to double the
character I've pressed. Can I modify this behaviour so that I can
recognize Alt key
keyboard(6), or:
http://lsub.org/magic/man2html/6/keyboard
27 matches
Mail list logo
