> I like the "or MIME" part. ;)
i forgot to include a reference: http://mail.9fans.net/listinfo/9fans
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 13:03:16 -0600
andrey mirtchovski wrote:
> "Don't submit messages containing flames or MIME. Content should be
> technical."
>
> I'm looking at all of you here!
>
I like the "or MIME" part. ;)
--
This is obviously some strange usage of the
word "simple" that I was previ
Hey guys,
I'm unable to cpu into my cpu server with every user except bootes, but
drawterm is working perfectly fine. When I try to cpu
in as any other user cpu spits out this line:
cpu: can't authenticate: 192.168.1.25: auth_proxy rpc write: bootes:
connection refused
What's really confusin
"Don't submit messages containing flames or MIME. Content should be technical."
I'm looking at all of you here!
On Jun 9, 2012 2:11 PM, "hiro" <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> I respect all you guy's senseless babbling as I'm being a lot more
> disrespectful than anyone here (currently installing windows 98). Go
> on.
>
I would shit on you for this, but I'm an OpenVMS user.
--
Veety
I respect all you guy's senseless babbling as I'm being a lot more
disrespectful than anyone here (currently installing windows 98). Go
on.
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 12:52:17 -0400
erik quanstrom wrote:
> On Sat Jun 9 12:32:20 EDT 2012, kh...@intma.in wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 05:53:42PM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote:
> > >
> > > And you see no contradiction that the seemingly obvious alternatives
> > > just simply haven't gained any
On Sat Jun 9 12:32:20 EDT 2012, kh...@intma.in wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 05:53:42PM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote:
> >
> > And you see no contradiction that the seemingly obvious alternatives
> > just simply haven't gained any ground at all?
> >
>
> Since you seem to be the sort of idiot who
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 05:53:42PM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote:
>
> And you see no contradiction that the seemingly obvious alternatives
> just simply haven't gained any ground at all?
>
Since you seem to be the sort of idiot who can't differentiate technical
quality from distribution volume, I'll
Kurt H Maier: Are you claiming it is good through tenure, which is
obviously a fallacy, or are you actually calling this catastrophe of a
standard "great"?
Lucio De Re: You're not offering a comparison, so, yes, I'm calling
it "good". So, apparently, do innumerable users, again, maybe for
want of
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 16:51:37 +0200
Lucio De Re wrote:
> > standards aren't laws. there's no moral component at all.
>
> Politics (insufficient resources) can put moral components into
> anything. But most technical standard organisations do aim to avoid
> making the type of short sighted judgem
> MIME is a shitty workaround (badly) designed to cram non-text data into
> a text-based protocol. Instead of using proper transfer protocols to
> transfer files, some morons decided to shove binary data into text-based
> messaging. When the web crowd decided they, too, would like to shove
> unli
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 16:29:15 +0200
Lucio De Re wrote:
> > How much more so then should we oppose
> > standards which benefit nobody while requiring a lot of work to no
> > purpose?
>
> You're getting lost. The MIME standard (RFC 1341, June 1992) is what
> you started criticising
Wrong. I don't
> Are you claiming it is good through tenure, which is obviously a
> fallacy, or are you actually calling this catastrophe of a standard
> "great"?
You're not offering a comparison, so, yes, I'm calling it "good". So,
apparently, do innumerable users, again, maybe for want of a better
product. T
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 04:29:15PM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote:
>
> (a) that a phenomenal
> amount of effort went into establishing that standard;
Then it belongs on someone's refrigerator, next to a participation
award. Bad decisions aren't less bad just because a lot of people
worked hard to make
> standards aren't laws. there's no moral component at all.
Politics (insufficient resources) can put moral components into
anything. But most technical standard organisations do aim to avoid
making the type of short sighted judgements that lead to resource
depletion. Then the market comes alon
> Regardless of how unjust a law is, it must be obeyed, for it is the
> Law! Right? Hah! I'm one of those people who believe citizens have a
> duty to oppose unjust laws. How much more so then should we oppose
> standards which benefit nobody while requiring a lot of work to no
> purpose?
standard
> How much more so then should we oppose
> standards which benefit nobody while requiring a lot of work to no
> purpose?
You're getting lost. The MIME standard (RFC 1341, June 1992) is what
you started criticising and you're overlooking (a) that a phenomenal
amount of effort went into establishin
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 02:00:37 -0400
erik quanstrom wrote:
> regardless of what one thinks of the standard, the header charset
> takes precidence! see
> http://www.webstandards.org/learn/articles/askw3c/dec2002/
> it sucks, but it's better to follow standards than to invent one's own.
Regardless
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:05:06 -0700
David Leimbach wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:44 AM, erik quanstrom
> wrote:
>
> > i haven't seen any evidence that strongly typed files are a good idea.
> > but maybe
> > others have?
> >
>
> I can tell you that the "Big Data Analytics" explosion that's b
webfs does provide the contenttype info. and abaco reads it.
abaco also implements the document charset/encoding override
in the document.
--
cinap
21 matches
Mail list logo
