> does anyone want to help test pap's native awk?
Build it and they'll come :-)
URL? Is it portable? How carefully was it ported?
It may be worth twisting Aaron's arm, he may well have a test suite
for GAWK that can be used here?
Lucio.
>> It is the Plan 9 Way (TM) to avoid > nested inclusion of header files,
>
> $ arch/dat.h includes port/portdat.h in kernel. Exempted too?
That's out of necessity, the alternative(s) would be considerably less
practical. If memory serves, port/portdat.h is not strictly a header
file in the conn
Quoting lu...@proxima.alt.za:
It is the Plan 9 Way (TM) to avoid nested inclusion of header files,
although I guess the APE may be exempted.
while I agree it's not very plan-9-like, the posix standard is horrible and
broken and nobody should be surprised that the easy way to implement it
invol
> It is the Plan 9 Way (TM) to avoid > nested inclusion of header files,
$ arch/dat.h includes port/portdat.h in kernel. Exempted too?
Álvaro Jurado Cuevas
http://colmenar.biz.tm
El 30/05/2015 07:11, escribió:
> > Which version?
> >
> > "The id_t and pid_t types shall be defined as described in
> Which version?
>
> "The id_t and pid_t types shall be defined as described in
> ." in issue 6
>
> "The header shall define the id_t and pid_t types as
> described in ." in issue 7
>
> in the sys/wait.h part of the headers section of base definitions
I haven't looked at cinap's work, but.
On Fri May 29 14:26:54 PDT 2015, cinap_len...@felloff.net wrote:
> i did a google search for it and found this:
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/sys/wait.h.html
>
> which stated:
>
> "The id_t and pid_t types shall be defined as described in ."
>
> and also looked in
Quoting erik quanstrom :
On Wed May 27 12:51:19 PDT 2015, cinap_len...@felloff.net wrote:
> A potential bug in APE sys/wait.h : the header does not make sure
that pid_t
> has been defined.
> Compiling sbase on Plan9/APE ended up in situations where there
were lots of
> compilation faliures
i did a google search for it and found this:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/sys/wait.h.html
which stated:
"The id_t and pid_t types shall be defined as described in ."
and also looked in openbsd's which did #include
which was good enougth for me, tho i'm not a unix ex
On Mon May 25 12:39:27 PDT 2015, staal1...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I tried using the following shim header to satisfy in a package I
> want to build.
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/libressl-portable/portable/master/include/err.h
>
> It looked pretty neat since it does everything
On Wed May 27 12:51:19 PDT 2015, cinap_len...@felloff.net wrote:
> > A potential bug in APE sys/wait.h : the header does not make sure that
> > pid_t
> > has been defined.
> > Compiling sbase on Plan9/APE ended up in situations where there were lots
> > of
> > compilation faliures simply becaus
10 matches
Mail list logo
