Which version?
The id_t and pid_t types shall be defined as described in
sys/types.h. in issue 6
The sys/wait.h header shall define the id_t and pid_t types as
described in sys/types.h. in issue 7
in the sys/wait.h part of the headers section of base definitions
I haven't looked
It is the Plan 9 Way (TM) to avoid nested inclusion of header files,
$ arch/dat.h includes port/portdat.h in kernel. Exempted too?
Álvaro Jurado Cuevas
http://colmenar.biz.tm
El 30/05/2015 07:11, lu...@proxima.alt.za escribió:
Which version?
The id_t and pid_t types shall be defined as
On Wed May 27 12:51:19 PDT 2015, cinap_len...@felloff.net wrote:
A potential bug in APE sys/wait.h : the header does not make sure that
pid_t
has been defined.
Compiling sbase on Plan9/APE ended up in situations where there were lots
of
compilation faliures simply because
On Mon May 25 12:39:27 PDT 2015, staal1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
I tried using the following shim header to satisfy err.h in a package I
want to build.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/libressl-portable/portable/master/include/err.h
It looked pretty neat since it does everything in
i did a google search for it and found this:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/sys/wait.h.html
which stated:
The id_t and pid_t types shall be defined as described in sys/types.h.
and also looked in openbsd's sys/wait.h which did #include sys/types.h
which was good
Quoting erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net:
On Wed May 27 12:51:19 PDT 2015, cinap_len...@felloff.net wrote:
A potential bug in APE sys/wait.h : the header does not make sure
that pid_t
has been defined.
Compiling sbase on Plan9/APE ended up in situations where there
were lots of
