Re: [9fans] Web Gardens

2015-10-15 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
On Oct 14, 2015, at 1:32 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote: > No, it's https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIV4poUZAQo No, that's just management. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [9fans] Web Gardens

2015-10-15 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
On Oct 14, 2015, at 1:35 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote: > As usual, the official reference was short on the implementation detail. Try > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTQfGd3G6dg This, of course, is just the SEC review. signature.asc Description: Message signed with

Re: [9fans] Web Gardens

2015-10-15 Thread erik quanstrom
On Mon Oct 12 09:16:37 PDT 2015, k...@sciops.net wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 05:57:16PM +1300, Andrew Simmons wrote: > > As a diversion from the discussion of the existential essence of > > Javascript, > > could I ask the group for a view on the meaning of the term "Web Garden"? > > I was

Re: [9fans] Web Gardens

2015-10-15 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 07:10:01PM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote: > > i'd recommend a google search > > https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant=1=2=UTF-8#q=web%20garden > I deeply apologize for failing to summarize to your satisfaction. I have bookmarked the url you provided and

Re: [9fans] Web Gardens

2015-10-15 Thread Prof Brucee
Sounds like a lot of bullshit to me. No fish slapping. On 16/10/2015 2:50 PM, "Kurt H Maier" wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 07:10:01PM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote: > > > > i'd recommend a google search > > > > >