It's taken nearly 3 days for Ubuntu to upgrade (vmware) with kswapd using
more than 100 mins of CPU.
8 3.8GHz procs. Deeply wrong.
brucee
On 12/04/2017 1:32 PM, "Winston Kodogo" wrote:
There is something deeply wrong with many things. Just ask jwz:
https://www.jwz.org/blog/2017/04/would-you-l
There is something deeply wrong with many things. Just ask jwz:
https://www.jwz.org/blog/2017/04/would-you-like-to-supersize-that-for-a-dollar-extra/
But at least ed is still the standard editor. Such is progress.
On 12 April 2017 at 15:16, Prof Brucee wrote:
> Ubuntu doesn't return all proces
Ubuntu doesn't return all processes for "ps -e" so I guess there's
something deeply wrong with /proc.
brucee
On 12/04/2017 12:56 AM, "Mat Kovach" wrote:
>From the man page:
=$ man ps
PS(1) PS(1)
NAME
ps, psu - process
I did more test on david code and found a problem.
-bash$ mk -f mkfile_david
-bash$ o.test_dirread -a /usr/bin |wc
10844336 27266
-bash$ o.test_dirread /usr/bin |wc
10844336 27266
-bash$ ls /usr/bin |wc
110811089719
option -a is for dirreadall.
1108 - 1084 entries
>From the man page:
=$ man ps
PS(1) PS(1)
NAME
ps, psu - process status
SYNOPSIS
ps [ -pa ]
psu [ -pa ] [ user ]
[snip]
With the -p flag, ps also prints, after the system time, the
baseline and current priorities of each process.
The -a flag causes ps to print the arguments for th
Hmm checked twice
zhilkin@szhilkin:~/Work/Mem> ps ax | wc -l
350
szhilkin@szhilkin:~/Work/Mem> 9 ps -e | wc -l
350
2017-04-11 10:51 GMT+03:00 Bruce Ellis :
> Doesn't help.
>
> brucee
>
> On 11 April 2017 at 17:21, Sergey Zhilkin wrote:
>
>> Seems ps (shell script from hell) uses plan9p
Doesn't help.
brucee
On 11 April 2017 at 17:21, Sergey Zhilkin wrote:
> Seems ps (shell script from hell) uses plan9port sort. And coreutils sort
> do not undarstand +1 parameter.
>
> Try to place plan9port path before any other.
>
> 2017-04-11 9:54 GMT+03:00 Bruce Ellis :
>
>> using plan9ports
Also, on Linux (OpenSUSE 42.2) i have same output of p9p ps -e and ps ax in
line count
2017-04-11 10:21 GMT+03:00 Sergey Zhilkin :
> Seems ps (shell script from hell) uses plan9port sort. And coreutils sort
> do not undarstand +1 parameter.
>
> Try to place plan9port path before any other.
>
> 20
Seems ps (shell script from hell) uses plan9port sort. And coreutils sort
do not undarstand +1 parameter.
Try to place plan9port path before any other.
2017-04-11 9:54 GMT+03:00 Bruce Ellis :
> using plan9ports' "ps -e" does not print all processes. dirread /proc fun
> I guess.
>
> brucee
>
>
