On 15 May 2017 at 17:44, trebol wrote:
> > = is part of rc syntax, like {} and (), and it interprets it, not the
i'd forgotten about the = in >[2=1], so you'd need another exception ...
rc would interpret that, but then in [a-b=] it presumably wouldn't again...
by doing it in the grammar, the redirection issue is avoided.- erikOn May 16, 2017 2:24 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote:On 15 May 2017 at 17:44, trebol wrote:> = is part of rc syntax, like {} and (), and it interprets it, not thei'd forgotten about the = in >[2=1], so you'd need
Tonight I've tried this little hack, but I do not have a comprehensive test
suite (does any exists?)
https://github.com/JehanneOS/jehanne/commit/003141901af25f0bb3556be40b7ff963f57ced32
I thought that there's no reason to mimic sh for this since if you need sh
to run a script rc won't work anyway
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:32:09PM -0400, s...@9front.org wrote:
> Honestly, the equality sign is never a problem for me.
> What is the purpose again of making this change?
>
> sl
Why won't anyone answer this question?
Is bikeshedding a minor inconvenience worth this kind of complexity?
khm
imo instead of changing = behavior * and ? should give errors like
following if unmatched.
rc: #d/0: token '*': syntax error
rc: #d/0: token '?': syntax error
Il 16 Maggio 2017 19:11:33 CEST, Kurt H Maier ha scritto:
>On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:32:09PM -0400, s...@9front.org wrote:
>> Honestly, the equality sign is never a problem for me.
>> What is the purpose again of making this change?
>>
>> sl
>
>Why won't anyone answer this question?
Rc run