I've got one of these boards kicking around:
https://core-electronics.com.au/realtek-ameba-board.html
ARM Cortex-M3 CPU, wifi, my board has the NFC, there is one that looks like
a NodeMCU, it has basic features. I've not used the smaller board.
I'm using an Arduino bootloader on my Ameba for now
> I started porting a 9p library and writing an fs for esp8266 using
> espressif sdk, but stopped once I found out tls1.2 isn't supported (not
> fixable; bug in firmware).
> I think esp32 is a better choice, but then, why not use rpi-zero or other
> ARM, MIPS devices. Arguments for esp32 for power
> i would be very happy to see a modern browser on plan9, though
> i would not want anyone to spend a lot of time supporting one.
> in the meantime i just use remote desktop to a windows box.
what's the difference really? i also remote into a windows box, from
my linux box. and i drawterm into my
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Rui Carmo wrote:
> I honestly don’t think Plan9 or Inferno will become “general use” without
> (at the very least) a modern browser, but that was not what motivated me to
> post here.
>
> Inferno, dis and 9p seem like a good fit for embedded devices, and having
>
Russ had a set of diffs to kfs to make it an encrypted filesystem...
-Steve
On Sun, 12/31/17, Bakul Shah wrote:
> I don't think we can assume a more popular plan9 would have
> met the fate of Linux. What bothers (some of) us is not that
> Linux is mainstream but that it is far too complicated and
> kitchensinky.
I'd like to think that there can be widespread use without
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Bakul Shah wrote:
>
>
> Wasn't Styx-on-a-Brick running on a device with 32K RAM + 16K
> ROM? Though that was for controlling a Lego Mindstorm device.
>
I think that was just a 9P fs on the lego brick.
On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 18:28:48 + "Brian L. Stuart"
wrote:
Brian L. Stuart writes:
> On Sun, 12/31/17, Rui Carmo wrote:
> > I honestly don't think Plan9 or Inferno will become
> > "general use" without (at the very least) a modern
> > browser,
>
> For which we can all be grateful. "General us
mmm, not sure i agree.
i would be very happy to see a modern browser on plan9, though
i would not want anyone to spend a lot of time supporting one.
a few years ago cinap got opera and firefox to run as linux binaries under
linuxemu. i spent some time tweaking that code to run more recent releas
On Sat, 12/30/17, Andre Wingor wrote:
> And also ready-made live distributions for launching from USB and
> installing on a desktop with simple copying
> without admins privileges.
I haven't thought about anything along those lines with the
hosted versions, but a while back I did start putting t
On Sun, 12/31/17, Rui Carmo wrote:
> I honestly don’t think Plan9 or Inferno will become
> “general use” without (at the very least) a modern
> browser,
For which we can all be grateful. "General use" is not a
good thing to be desired. One of the biggest reasons I
moved away from Linux was that
I honestly don’t think Plan9 or Inferno will become “general use” without (at
the very least) a modern browser, but that was not what motivated me to post
here.
Inferno, dis and 9p seem like a good fit for embedded devices, and having run
it successfully on a Raspberry Pi a few months ago
(htt
True story
https://goo.gl/r2ueQC
Sorry for offtop
hope to see you soon
--
http://andr.ru
--
www.andr.ru
14 matches
Mail list logo
