it isn't used
On Sat, 4 May 2024 at 22:45, Alyssa M via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> wrote:
> Is the presence of the duplicate names when reading a union directory
> actually needed/used anywhere? Or is it just an artefact of the most
> straightforward implementation for Plan 9?
>
> I ask because I'm
Is the presence of the duplicate names when reading a union directory actually
needed/used anywhere? Or is it just an artefact of the most straightforward
implementation for Plan 9?
I ask because I'm implementing the Plan 9 system calls on my own OS. If I don't
have to implement the name
Imho, we would like to get some more info, what happened.
1) Was it the fossil write buffer?
2) Was it the venti index ?
We can safely exclude the venti arenas, or ?
As you mentioned a 2nd set of SSDs, how long did the last one hold?
Why is the whole set affected? Raid-x?
> On May 4, 2024, at 8:13 AM, Steven Stallion wrote:
>
> All,
>
> It has taken almost 15 years, but fossil has finally managed to chew
> through a second set of SSDs
What does that mean? Does fossil do too many writes, or did they fail for some
other reason? Did you have a heavy write load
plan9 is one of the silmarills and you just throw it into throat of ungoliant
:-(
/n/fingolfinFS
- Původní zpráva -
Odesilatel: Steven Stallion (sstall...@gmail.com)
Datum: 05/04/24 17:15
Příjemce: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs (9fans@9fans.net)
Předmět: [9fans] Throwing in
All,
It has taken almost 15 years, but fossil has finally managed to chew
through a second set of SSDs and I just don't have the heart to feed
it a third. As of last night, I backed up my venti store, dutifully
recorded vacs, and deracked the equipment.
I first encountered Plan 9 while working
